-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Optimize casts from constant byrefs #99130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
MichalPetryka
wants to merge
5
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
MichalPetryka:byref-cast
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−0
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ad35f3a
Optimize casts from constant byrefs
MichalPetryka e52a42b
Retype BYREF constants instead of folding a new cast
MichalPetryka d234bef
Merge branch 'main' into byref-cast
MichalPetryka 002f7ef
Merge branch 'main' into byref-cast
MichalPetryka c2fca8f
Merge branch 'main' into byref-cast
MichalPetryka File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might create e.g. a nongc icon handle typed as TYP_I_IMPL. I think we have a couple of asserts expecting those to be always TYP_REF. What exactly this change improves?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TYP_BYREFmake it okay?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Which doesn't sound right e.g. - does it strip it for relocable (AOT) handles as well?
Diffs are small and are regressions so does it make sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Made it retype the handles instead.
The only diff currently is from a GC hole that's fixed in #99138, I'd guess this won't have any diffs in the BCL or tests outside of #99011 since those don't generally use AsPointer on statics or RVA statics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's nice that it helped you to find a gc hole! No diff in BCL means it's basically untested, it's probably fine now but may fail in future if we introduce byref icon handle? I think we should do changes like these only if they provide clear benefits and risks are understood