Skip to content

handle case of Proc Index > MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS #109295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

handle case of Proc Index > MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS #109295

Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
8599ee0
handle case of Proc Index > MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS
mangod9 Oct 28, 2024
c0ef88f
PR feedback
mangod9 Oct 29, 2024
f52c402
Merge branch 'main' into max_cpu
mangod9 Oct 29, 2024
f64b7dd
Merge branch 'main' into max_cpu
mangod9 Oct 29, 2024
0b1f6ad
Update comment
mangod9 Oct 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions src/coreclr/gc/gc.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6450,7 +6450,8 @@ class heap_select
if (GCToOSInterface::CanGetCurrentProcessorNumber())
{
uint32_t proc_no = GCToOSInterface::GetCurrentProcessorNumber();
proc_no_to_heap_no[proc_no] = (uint16_t)heap_number;
// proc_no could likely exceed MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS on x86
proc_no_to_heap_no[proc_no % MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS] = (uint16_t)heap_number;
}
}

Expand All @@ -6472,7 +6473,8 @@ class heap_select
if (GCToOSInterface::CanGetCurrentProcessorNumber())
{
uint32_t proc_no = GCToOSInterface::GetCurrentProcessorNumber();
int adjusted_heap = proc_no_to_heap_no[proc_no];
// proc_no could likely exceed MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS on x86
int adjusted_heap = proc_no_to_heap_no[proc_no % MAX_SUPPORTED_CPUS];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this was code from before but do we need adjusted_heap to be signed? Will there ever be a case where adjusted_heap is negative?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't believe that could occur.

// with dynamic heap count, need to make sure the value is in range.
if (adjusted_heap >= gc_heap::n_heaps)
{
Expand Down