Skip to content

Conversation

@kunalspathak
Copy link
Contributor

@kunalspathak kunalspathak commented Apr 29, 2024

  • SignExtend16
  • SignExtend32
  • SignExtend8
  • ZeroExtend16
  • ZeroExtend32
  • ZeroExtend8

All tests passing: https://gist.github.com/kunalspathak/d8c244f02f51e1a9e247f97f9d23b9e3

Contributes to #99957

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 29, 2024

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@dotnet-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-runtime-intrinsics
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@kunalspathak kunalspathak added the arm-sve Work related to arm64 SVE/SVE2 support label Apr 29, 2024
@kunalspathak kunalspathak requested a review from TIHan April 29, 2024 23:32
@kunalspathak
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dotnet/arm64-contrib

Copy link
Contributor

@TIHan TIHan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

{
assert(intrin.op3->IsVectorZero());
if (intrin.op1->isContained())
if (intrin.op1->isContained() || intrin.op1->IsMaskAllBitsSet())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The intrin.op1->isContained() seems pointless here, no?

We just need to know its not contained for an instruction that actually requires its use (like abs)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i will have to double check on this one. There was lot of back and forth on this for certain scenarios. I will verify it on next round.

matouskozak pushed a commit to matouskozak/runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
* Add [Sign|Zero]Extend[8|16|32] APIs:

* Add API to instruction mapping

* eliminate extra movprfx for AllBitsSetMask

* Add test cases
michaelgsharp pushed a commit to michaelgsharp/runtime that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
* Add [Sign|Zero]Extend[8|16|32] APIs:

* Add API to instruction mapping

* eliminate extra movprfx for AllBitsSetMask

* Add test cases
Ruihan-Yin pushed a commit to Ruihan-Yin/runtime that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
* Add [Sign|Zero]Extend[8|16|32] APIs:

* Add API to instruction mapping

* eliminate extra movprfx for AllBitsSetMask

* Add test cases
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants