Cannot get symbol ucol_setMaxVariable_50 from libicui18n

[abarberenaCPDS]

After following the steps here, https://dotnet.microsoft.com/download/dotnet/thank-you/sdk-5.0.103-linux-arm64-binaries. I am getting the following exception when running:

dotnet --version

Cannot get symbol ucol_setMaxVariable_50 from libicui18n
Error: /lib64/libicui18n.so.50: undefined symbol: ucol_setMaxVariable_50
[1]    8639 abort      dotnet --version

Environment:

• Raspberry Pi 3B+
• Micro Center 32GB microSDHC Card Class 10
• Clean install of Centos aarch64 RPI Minimal 4

name -a
Linux centosraspberrypi 5.4.72-v8.1.el7 dotnet/sdk
#1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Oct 21 17:35:36 UTC 2020 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

[phillip-haydon]

I'm getting the same issue.

@abarberenaCPDS

https://gist.github.com/Sunlighter/fe602d2a090e64a01c3369fe7d7d7325

This worked for me.

[dsplaisted]

@agocke @lakichemole @vitek-karas @tarekgh Can one of you triage or route this as appropriate? Thanks.

[tarekgh]

This looks the runtime bits was built on a machine which is using ICU version greater than 52 which is statically link against ucol_setMaxVariable that is not available on ICU version prior to 53.

runtime/src/libraries/Native/Unix/System.Globalization.Native/configure.cmake

Line 19 in 5255bbb

ucol_setMaxVariable

I am trying to find a contact who can help with that.

The workaround for this issue, install ICU version higher than 52 on the machine that is failing with this error. I am not sure if such distros provide such option though.

[tarekgh]

@janvorli do you know who can help with this issue?

[tarekgh]

CC @MichaelSimons

[tarekgh]

CC @dleeapho

[tarekgh]

@abarberenaCPDS is there a way you can try to upgrade the installed ICU package? or tell how I can get Linux centosraspberrypi image to try? @phillip-haydon comment https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/issues/16009#issuecomment-901639066 has a good workaround to try too.

[tarekgh]

@dsplaisted I am not the right one to assign here. I am trying to figure out who can help.