Skip to content

Conversation

@sharwell
Copy link
Contributor

@sharwell sharwell commented Jan 24, 2019

This change works around coverlet-coverage/coverlet#318 to immediately enable correct coverage for test code.

@codemzs codemzs requested review from TomFinley and shauheen January 24, 2019 17:28
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #2230 into master will increase coverage by 3.52%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.08%    69.6%   +3.52%     
==========================================
  Files         638      784     +146     
  Lines      116423   143822   +27399     
  Branches    14846    16656    +1810     
==========================================
+ Hits        76939   100109   +23170     
- Misses      35231    39170    +3939     
- Partials     4253     4543     +290
Flag Coverage Δ
#Debug 69.6% <ø> (+3.52%) ⬆️
#production 65.97% <ø> (?)
#test 84.76% <ø> (?)

@shauheen
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think adding the test folder is valuable for the coverage at this point.

Eventually codecov.io should support the automatic application of flags
based on directory structure. In the meantime, upload the coverage
report twice and allow the server to filter and apply the desired flags.
Copy link
Contributor

@TomFinley TomFinley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @sharwell !

@codemzs codemzs self-requested a review January 24, 2019 19:08
@codemzs codemzs merged commit 5de82ed into dotnet:master Jan 24, 2019
@sharwell sharwell deleted the enable-test-coverage branch January 24, 2019 20:08
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 25, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants