Update ThreadLocal`1.xml #9815
Open
Update ThreadLocal`1.xml #9815
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Alter wording of `ThreadLocal.Value` initialization to clarify that `NULL -/-> NOT(init)` following dotnet/runtime#101105 Also, removed `MissingMemberException` mention; Value-factory-less initialization does not use reflection, so the exception can never occur.
ghost
added
the
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
the
community-contribution
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 06f77fa: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. For any questions, please:
|
|
Learn Build status updates of commit 4a2dbba: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. For any questions, please:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Alter wording of
ThreadLocal.Valueinitialization to clarify thatNULL -/-> NOT(init)following dotnet/runtime#101105Also, removed
MissingMemberExceptionmention; Value-factory-less initialization does not use reflection, so the exception can never occur.Questions
I'm not too keen on the wording of the sentence I added. Feel free to offer suggestions on how to improve it.