-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
[Mono.Android] suppress/solve more illink warnings #8063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | ||
| using System; | ||
| using System.Collections.Generic; | ||
| using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis; | ||
| using System.Reflection; | ||
| using System.Linq; | ||
| using System.Runtime.CompilerServices; | ||
|
|
@@ -116,6 +117,7 @@ internal static bool ActivationEnabled { | |
| } | ||
| #endif // !JAVA_INTEROP | ||
|
|
||
| [UnconditionalSuppressMessage ("Trimming", "IL2057", Justification = "Type.GetType() can never statically know the string value from parameter 'signature'.")] | ||
| static Type[] GetParameterTypes (string? signature) | ||
| { | ||
| if (String.IsNullOrEmpty (signature)) | ||
|
|
@@ -127,6 +129,7 @@ static Type[] GetParameterTypes (string? signature) | |
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| [UnconditionalSuppressMessage ("Trimming", "IL2057", Justification = "Type.GetType() can never statically know the string value from parameter 'typename_ptr'.")] | ||
| static void n_Activate (IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr jclass, IntPtr typename_ptr, IntPtr signature_ptr, IntPtr jobject, IntPtr parameters_ptr) | ||
| { | ||
| var o = Java.Lang.Object.PeekObject (jobject); | ||
|
|
@@ -163,6 +166,7 @@ static void n_Activate (IntPtr jnienv, IntPtr jclass, IntPtr typename_ptr, IntPt | |
| Activate (jobject, cinfo, parms); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| [UnconditionalSuppressMessage ("Trimming", "IL2072", Justification = "RuntimeHelpers.GetUninitializedObject() does not statically know the return value from ConstructorInfo.DeclaringType.")] | ||
| internal static void Activate (IntPtr jobject, ConstructorInfo cinfo, object? []? parms) | ||
| { | ||
| try { | ||
|
|
@@ -257,6 +261,8 @@ internal static IJavaPeerable CreateInstance (IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership | |
| return CreateInstance (handle, transfer, null); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| [UnconditionalSuppressMessage ("Trimming", "IL2067", Justification = "TypeManager.CreateProxy() does not statically know the value of the 'type' local variable.")] | ||
| [UnconditionalSuppressMessage ("Trimming", "IL2072", Justification = "TypeManager.CreateProxy() does not statically know the value of the 'type' local variable.")] | ||
| internal static IJavaPeerable CreateInstance (IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer, Type? targetType) | ||
| { | ||
| Type? type = null; | ||
|
|
@@ -318,7 +324,7 @@ internal static IJavaPeerable CreateInstance (IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership | |
| static readonly Type[] XAConstructorSignature = new Type [] { typeof (IntPtr), typeof (JniHandleOwnership) }; | ||
| static readonly Type[] JIConstructorSignature = new Type [] { typeof (JniObjectReference).MakeByRefType (), typeof (JniObjectReferenceOptions) }; | ||
|
|
||
| internal static object CreateProxy (Type type, IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) | ||
| internal static object CreateProxy ([DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicConstructors | DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.NonPublicConstructors)] Type type, IntPtr handle, JniHandleOwnership transfer) | ||
|
||
| { | ||
| // Skip Activator.CreateInstance() as that requires public constructors, | ||
| // and we want to hide some constructors for sanity reasons. | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code-formatting wise, I think adding these parameter custom attributes makes the resulting code less readable, so I would prefer changing these into multi-line signatures:
Additionally, why
[DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicMethods | DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.NonPublicMethods)]and not[DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.All)]?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently the trimmer warning specifies which values to use.