feat: Implement get single work item and detect truncated relationships #22
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… the list of attachments and links are loaded completely
…user requests work items
ewuerger
requested changes
Jan 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: Ernst Würger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ernst Würger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We now also support requesting a single work item by its ID with all fields in one request. This includes all linked work items and attachments. According to the documentation, there will be a meta section in the relationships section, if linked work items or attachments were truncated. We use this knowledge to set newly introduced
linked_work_items_truncatedandattachments_truncatedflags in the WorkItem class. Both default to False, but if a work item is returned by the client as result of a get request, we will only set these flags to False, if the corresponding field was requested (which is the case in the newly introducedget_work_itemfunction, but can be customized in the otherget_work_itemsfunctions) and if we know that the list of items is complete.