codespell: config, dedicated workflow + 1 typo fix #58
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
=== Do not change lines below ===
{
"chain": [],
"cmd": "codespell -w",
"exit": 0,
"extra_inputs": [],
"inputs": [],
"outputs": [],
"pwd": "."
}
^^^ Do not change lines above ^^^
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #58 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 92.68% 92.68%
=======================================
Files 5 5
Lines 41 41
=======================================
Hits 38 38
Misses 3 3 Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Member
Author
|
I heard no objections. Will merge tomorrow if none come |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Easier to digest (no typing checking) version of #45 to your review. We already have added similar setup (no tox.ini) codespelling to many extensions, so it is really just a matter of consistency and not wasting more PRs per each new extension.