feat: sign message #106
feat: sign message #106
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple modifications across various files, primarily focusing on the handling and management of wallet data within the application. Key alterations include updates to data structures, such as changing wallet storage from vectors to BTreeMaps, and adjustments to method signatures for wallet-related functions. Additionally, the user interface components have been refined to ensure proper wallet selection and display. Overall, these changes enhance the organization and processing of wallet data throughout the application. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
src/model/qualified_identity/qualified_identity_public_key.rs (1)
37-37: Consider simplifying the parameter type.While the current implementation works, consider simplifying the parameter type to reduce indirection levels. Instead of
&[&Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>], you could useimpl AsRef<[Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>]>which would:
- Maintain flexibility for different container types
- Reduce the levels of indirection
- Make the API more ergonomic
- pub fn from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check( - value: IdentityPublicKey, - network: Network, - wallets: &[&Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>], - ) -> Self { + pub fn from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check( + value: IdentityPublicKey, + network: Network, + wallets: impl AsRef<[Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>]>, + ) -> Self { + let wallets = wallets.as_ref();src/backend_task/identity/load_identity.rs (1)
79-79: Consider optimizing wallet checks to avoid Vec allocation.The conversion of wallet values to a Vec using
collect()creates unnecessary allocations. Consider modifyingfrom_identity_public_key_with_wallets_checkto accept an iterator instead.This would allow passing the iterator directly:
-&wallets.values().collect::<Vec<_>>() +wallets.values()The function signature in
QualifiedIdentityPublicKeywould need to change to:fn from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check<'a, I>( key: IdentityPublicKey, network: Network, wallets: I, ) where I: Iterator<Item = &'a Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>>Also applies to: 101-101, 141-141, 197-197
src/context.rs (2)
47-47: Excellent improvement to wallet storage structure!The change from
VectoBTreeMapwithWalletSeedHashas key is a solid architectural decision that:
- Improves wallet lookup efficiency from O(n) to O(log n)
- Ensures unique wallet identification
- Maintains thread safety with the double RwLock pattern
- Provides ordered iteration through keys
Consider documenting the thread safety guarantees and access patterns in a comment above the field to help future maintainers understand the concurrent access design.
359-359: Consider optimizing wallet iteration for asset lock processing.While the change to
values()is correct, the current implementation continues iterating through wallets even after finding a match. Since we break after finding the first match, we could usefindinstead offorto improve performance.- for wallet_arc in wallets.values() { - let mut wallet = wallet_arc.write().unwrap(); + if let Some(wallet_arc) = wallets.values().find(|w| { + let wallet = w.read().unwrap(); + payload.credit_outputs.iter().any(|tx_out| { + if let Ok(output_addr) = Address::from_script(&tx_out.script_pubkey, self.network) { + wallet.known_addresses.contains_key(&output_addr) + } else { + false + } + }) + }) { + let mut wallet = wallet_arc.write().unwrap();src/ui/identities/register_dpns_name_screen.rs (2)
92-97: Add a comment about wallet selection behaviorConsider adding a comment explaining the wallet selection behavior, especially since it's using the first wallet from a BTreeMap which has a different ordering than the previous vector implementation.
+ // Select the first available wallet from the BTreeMap + // Note: Order is based on BTreeMap key ordering let selected_wallet = if let Some(wallet) = app_context.wallets.read().unwrap().values().next() { Some(wallet.clone()) } else { None };
92-97: Consider improving wallet unlock error handlingThe wallet selection and unlock flow could benefit from more explicit error handling. Currently, if wallet unlock fails, the UI just returns early without showing why:
if needed_unlock && !just_unlocked { return; }Consider enhancing the error feedback to users.
if self.selected_wallet.is_some() { let (needed_unlock, just_unlocked) = self.render_wallet_unlock_if_needed(ui); if needed_unlock && !just_unlocked { + // Show a message explaining why the user can't proceed + ui.colored_label( + egui::Color32::DARK_RED, + "Please unlock your wallet to continue", + ); return; } }Also applies to: 266-267
src/ui/identities/add_existing_identity_screen.rs (1)
Line range hint
205-219: Consider handling RwLock poisoning gracefullyThe
read().unwrap()calls could panic if the RwLock is poisoned. In a UI context, we should handle these errors gracefully.Consider this safer approach:
- for (idx, wallet) in wallets.values().enumerate() { - let wallet_alias = wallet_aliases[idx].clone(); + for (idx, wallet) in wallets.values().enumerate() { + let wallet_alias = wallet.read().map(|w| + w.alias.clone().unwrap_or_else(|| "Unnamed Wallet".to_string()) + ).unwrap_or_else(|_| "Error: Wallet Locked".to_string());src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-478: Consider breaking down the UI into smaller componentsWhile the implementation is solid, the UI logic is quite complex. Consider extracting some of the UI elements into separate components:
- Password strength indicator
- Seed phrase grid
- Language selector
This would improve maintainability and reusability.src/model/wallet/mod.rs (1)
336-338: Consider enhancing error messages for better debugging.The error handling could be more descriptive to help with troubleshooting issues in production.
Consider this improvement:
- .derive_priv_ecdsa_for_master_seed(self.seed_bytes()?, Network::Dash) - .map_err(|e| e.to_string())?; + .derive_priv_ecdsa_for_master_seed(self.seed_bytes()?, Network::Dash) + .map_err(|e| format!("Failed to derive private key at path {}: {}", derivation_path, e))?;src/ui/wallet/wallets_screen/mod.rs (3)
Line range hint
216-237: Consider enhancing error handling for wallet operations.While the wallet iteration logic is correct, consider adding error handling for the following scenarios:
- Failed wallet lock acquisitions
- Invalid wallet states during selection
let wallets = &self.app_context.wallets.read().unwrap(); let wallet_aliases: Vec<String> = wallets .values() .map(|wallet| { - wallet - .read() - .unwrap() - .alias - .clone() - .unwrap_or_else(|| "Unnamed Wallet".to_string()) + wallet + .read() + .map(|w| w.alias.clone().unwrap_or_else(|| "Unnamed Wallet".to_string())) + .unwrap_or_else(|_| "Error: Wallet Locked".to_string()) }) .collect();
Line range hint
301-456: Consider extracting address data preparation logic.The address table rendering method is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider extracting the address data preparation logic into a separate method for better maintainability.
+ impl WalletsBalancesScreen { + fn prepare_address_data(&self, included_address_types: &HashSet<String>) -> Vec<AddressData> { + let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); + + wallet + .known_addresses + .iter() + .filter_map(|(address, derivation_path)| { + // ... existing address data preparation logic ... + }) + .collect() + } + } fn render_address_table(&mut self, ui: &mut Ui) -> AppAction { // ... existing setup code ... - let mut address_data = { - let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); - // ... existing address data preparation logic ... - }; + let mut address_data = self.prepare_address_data(&included_address_types); // ... rest of the rendering code ... }
Line range hint
457-489: Optimize sorting implementation.The current sorting implementation could be optimized by:
- Caching sort keys
- Using stable sorting for consistent results
- Implementing custom comparators for specific column types
fn sort_address_data(&self, data: &mut Vec<AddressData>) { - data.sort_by(|a, b| { + data.sort_by_cached_key(|item| { match self.sort_column { - SortColumn::Address => a.address.cmp(&b.address), + SortColumn::Address => item.address.clone(), // ... other sorting cases } }); if self.sort_order == SortOrder::Descending { data.reverse(); } }src/ui/identities/identities_screen.rs (3)
Line range hint
123-137: Consider simplifying the return statementThe code is correctly using
values()for BTreeMap iteration, but the return statement can be simplified.- return None; + None
Line range hint
449-505: Improve error handling for identity removalThe current implementation silently ignores database errors during identity removal. This could lead to inconsistencies between in-memory and persistent storage states.
Consider handling database errors explicitly:
- self.app_context - .db - .delete_local_qualified_identity(&identity_id, &self.app_context).ok(); + if let Err(e) = self.app_context + .db + .delete_local_qualified_identity(&identity_id, &self.app_context) { + eprintln!("Failed to delete identity from database: {}", e); + // Consider showing an error message to the user + return; + }
Line range hint
279-281: Extract magic number as a constantThe maximum number of keys to show is hardcoded. Consider extracting this as a constant for better maintainability.
+ const MAX_KEYS_TO_SHOW: usize = 3; let mut total_keys_shown = 0; - let max_keys_to_show = 3; + let max_keys_to_show = MAX_KEYS_TO_SHOW;src/ui/identities/add_new_identity_screen/mod.rs (3)
Line range hint
571-607: Consider enhancing key management security.The key selection implementation could benefit from additional security measures:
- Add validation for key uniqueness to prevent duplicate keys
- Consider implementing key rotation capabilities
- Add warnings when selecting lower security levels
fn render_key_selection(&mut self, ui: &mut egui::Ui) { + // Add warning for lower security levels + if self.in_key_selection_advanced_mode { + ui.colored_label( + Color32::YELLOW, + "Warning: Selecting lower security levels may reduce the security of your identity." + ); + } ui.horizontal(|ui| {
Line range hint
799-828: Enhance UI accessibility and user guidance.The UI implementation could be improved for better accessibility:
- Add ARIA labels for screen readers
- Provide keyboard shortcuts for common actions
- Consider adding progress indicators for long-running operations
fn ui(&mut self, ctx: &Context) -> AppAction { + // Add keyboard shortcuts + if ctx.input(|i| i.key_pressed(egui::Key::F1)) { + self.show_pop_up_info = Some("Help text...".to_string()); + } + let mut action = add_top_panel(
Line range hint
447-497: Improve error handling and user feedback.The error handling could be enhanced with more descriptive messages and better recovery options:
- Add specific error messages for each failure case
- Provide recovery suggestions when operations fail
- Consider implementing retry mechanisms for transient failures
fn render_funding_method(&mut self, ui: &mut egui::Ui) { let Some(selected_wallet) = self.selected_wallet.clone() else { + ui.colored_label( + Color32::RED, + "No wallet selected. Please select a wallet to continue." + ); return; };src/ui/identities/keys/key_info_screen.rs (4)
51-62: Remove commented-out code to improve maintainabilityThe code from lines 51 to 62 is commented out. Unless it's needed for future reference, consider removing it to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
219-288: Simplify nested conditional logic for better readabilityThe nested conditional statements between lines 219 and 288 increase complexity and reduce readability. Consider simplifying the logic by restructuring the conditions or extracting parts into helper methods.
For example, you can restructure the conditions to reduce nesting:
if self.wallet_open { if self.view_private_key_even_if_encrypted_or_in_wallet && self.selected_wallet.is_some() { // Display the private key } else { // Prompt to view private key } } else { // Wallet is not open, provide options to unlock }
425-470: Ensure proper handling of unsupported key types insign_messageIn the
sign_messagemethod, if the key type is unsupported, an error message is set. Consider logging this event or providing more guidance to the user on steps to resolve the issue.
36-48: Review field naming for clarity and consistencyThe field
view_private_key_even_if_encrypted_or_in_walletis quite long. Consider renaming it for brevity and clarity. A shorter name likeforce_view_private_keyorshow_private_keymight enhance readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
src/backend_task/identity/load_identity.rs(5 hunks)src/context.rs(5 hunks)src/database/identities.rs(3 hunks)src/model/qualified_identity/qualified_identity_public_key.rs(1 hunks)src/model/wallet/mod.rs(1 hunks)src/ui/identities/add_existing_identity_screen.rs(3 hunks)src/ui/identities/add_new_identity_screen/mod.rs(3 hunks)src/ui/identities/identities_screen.rs(1 hunks)src/ui/identities/keys/key_info_screen.rs(6 hunks)src/ui/identities/register_dpns_name_screen.rs(1 hunks)src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs(2 hunks)src/ui/wallet/wallets_screen/mod.rs(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
src/model/qualified_identity/qualified_identity_public_key.rs (1)
37-37: Verify the parameter type change impact.
The change from &[Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>] to &[&Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>] looks correct and aligns with the broader changes in wallet management (Vec to BTreeMap). However, let's verify all call sites are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Parameter type change is correctly implemented
The verification shows that all call sites in load_identity.rs are correctly using the new parameter type. The wallets are passed as &wallets.values().collect::<Vec<_>>(), which creates a Vec of references to the Arc<RwLock> values from the BTreeMap, matching the expected &[&Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>] signature. The change is consistent across all usage points.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all calls to from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check to verify they've been updated
# Expected: All calls should pass references to Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>
ast-grep --pattern 'from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check($$$)'
Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to find calls to this method
rg -l "from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check" --type rust
# Then let's examine the content of these files
rg "from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check" --type rust -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 2491
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual call sites in load_identity.rs to see how the wallets parameter is passed
rg -A 10 "from_identity_public_key_with_wallets_check\(" src/backend_task/identity/load_identity.rs
Length of output: 2092
src/database/identities.rs (1)
4-4: LGTM: Import changes align with the new wallet management structure
The addition of WalletSeedHash and BTreeMap imports supports the transition from vector-based to map-based wallet storage, which should provide more efficient wallet lookups.
Also applies to: 8-9
src/backend_task/identity/load_identity.rs (1)
294-296: LGTM: Clean and idiomatic wallet collection.
The mapping of wallet values to (seed_hash, wallet) pairs is implemented correctly and follows Rust idioms. The read lock is properly acquired for accessing the seed hash.
src/context.rs (2)
269-269: LGTM: Correct adaptation to BTreeMap iteration!
The change to values() properly adapts to the new BTreeMap structure while maintaining the existing transaction processing logic. The concurrent access pattern is safe with proper lock acquisition ordering.
47-47: Verify complete migration to BTreeMap access patterns.
Let's ensure all wallet access patterns in the codebase have been updated to use the new BTreeMap structure.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results and generate additional verification scripts to check the BTreeMap migration.
This will help us verify:
- The BTreeMap usage patterns
- How wallets are being accessed
- If there are any remaining Vec-based wallet storage patterns
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Migration to BTreeMap is complete and correctly implemented
The codebase shows a complete migration to BTreeMap for wallet storage:
- The main wallet storage uses
RwLock<BTreeMap<WalletSeedHash, Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>>>consistently - All wallet access patterns use BTreeMap methods (
.values(),.get(),.insert()) - No Vec-based wallet storage was found in the codebase
- Associated data structures (like
associated_walletsinQualifiedIdentity) also use BTreeMap
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential Vec-style wallet access patterns that might need updating
# Look for array access patterns
rg -g '!target' '\[.*\]' --type rust
# Look for iter() calls that might need to be values()
rg -g '!target' '\.iter\(\)' --type rust
# Look for Vec type declarations
rg -g '!target' 'Vec<.*Wallet.*>' --type rust
Length of output: 41277
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BTreeMap usage patterns to verify the migration
# Look for BTreeMap imports and usage
rg -g '!target' 'BTreeMap' --type rust -A 2
# Look for wallet access patterns to verify they're using BTreeMap methods
rg -g '!target' 'wallets\.' --type rust -A 2
# Look for any remaining Vec-based wallet storage
ast-grep --pattern 'Vec<$_Wallet$_>'
Length of output: 26740
src/ui/identities/register_dpns_name_screen.rs (1)
92-97: Verify wallet selection order dependency
The change from vector to BTreeMap means the "first" wallet might be different now (BTreeMap orders by key). Ensure this doesn't affect any assumptions about wallet selection order in the UI.
src/ui/identities/add_existing_identity_screen.rs (3)
113-113: LGTM: Wallet access updated for BTreeMap
The change from first().cloned() to values().next().cloned() correctly adapts the code to work with the new BTreeMap-based wallet storage.
Line range hint 184-191: LGTM: Wallet iteration updated for BTreeMap
The changes correctly adapt the wallet iteration logic to work with BTreeMap's values, maintaining the same functionality while working with the new data structure.
Line range hint 449-458: Verify the commented-out wallet functionality
There's commented-out code related to wallet functionality in the ui method. This appears to disable the "From Wallet" tab feature. Please verify if this is intentional or if the wallet functionality should be restored.
Let's check for any related changes or issues:
✅ Verification successful
Wallet functionality is intentionally disabled during refactoring
The code analysis reveals that the wallet functionality is deliberately commented out as part of a structured change:
- The
IdentityLoadMethodenum still contains theFromWalletvariant - The "From Wallet" tab and its rendering logic (
render_from_wallet) are fully implemented - The wallet-related code is commented out in a specific section that would add the wallet tab conditionally based on wallet availability
- All the supporting wallet infrastructure (wallet selection, unlocking, etc.) remains in place
This appears to be an intentional temporary disable during refactoring, not a bug or oversight, as the implementation is complete but just commented out at the tab registration point.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related wallet functionality changes
rg -A 5 "FromWallet.*IdentityLoadMethod"
Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find wallet-related functionality
# Search for wallet-related code in the specific file
rg -A 5 -i "wallet" "src/ui/identities/add_existing_identity_screen.rs"
# Search for IdentityLoadMethod enum or struct definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum IdentityLoadMethod { $$$ }'
# Look for any tabs or load methods in the file
rg -A 5 "Tab|LoadMethod" "src/ui/identities/add_existing_identity_screen.rs"
Length of output: 6945
src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs (1)
159-159: LGTM! Improved wallet storage with BTreeMap
The change from push to insert with seed_hash as key is a good architectural improvement that prevents duplicate wallets and provides efficient lookup.
Let's verify the error handling for duplicate wallet insertion:
✅ Verification successful
BTreeMap wallet insertion is properly handled
The code analysis shows that wallet insertion is well-managed:
- The wallet is first stored in the database with error handling (
store_wallet(...).map_err(|e| e.to_string())?) - The BTreeMap insertion happens only after successful database storage
- Write lock acquisition is properly checked (
if let Ok(mut wallets) = self.app_context.wallets.write()) - The
insertoperation on BTreeMap naturally handles duplicates by overwriting, which is appropriate here as the wallet was already validated and stored in the database
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how duplicate wallet insertions are handled across the codebase
# Check for any duplicate handling in wallet storage logic
rg -U "insert.*wallet" --type rust
# Look for error handling related to duplicate wallets
rg -U "duplicate.*wallet|wallet.*exists" --type rust
# Check the Wallet struct implementation for seed_hash method
ast-grep --pattern 'impl Wallet {
$$$
fn seed_hash($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 954
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the BTreeMap insertion context and error handling
# Check the function containing the wallet insertion
ast-grep --pattern 'fn $FUNC_NAME($_) {
$$$
wallets.insert($$$)
$$$
}'
# Look for any error handling around wallet operations
rg -U "Result.*wallet|Error.*wallet" --type rust
# Check if there's any validation before wallet insertion
rg -B 5 -A 2 "insert.*wallet" --type rust
Length of output: 4354
src/model/wallet/mod.rs (1)
332-340: LGTM! The implementation looks secure and well-structured.
The new method private_key_at_derivation_path follows good practices:
- Proper error handling using Result type
- Consistent with the codebase's cryptographic operations
- Clear and focused implementation
Let's verify that this method is used consistently across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The implementation is verified and used consistently across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- The method is used correctly in the UI layer (
key_info_screen.rs) for key information display - The implementation follows the same pattern as other private key derivation methods in the codebase
- Error handling is consistent with other similar operations in the wallet module
- The method integrates well with the existing derivation path and network-specific functionality
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to private_key_at_derivation_path
ast-grep --pattern 'private_key_at_derivation_path($$$)'
# Search for similar private key derivation patterns to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'derive_priv_ecdsa_for_master_seed($$$)'
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search using ripgrep
echo "=== Searching for private_key_at_derivation_path usage ==="
rg "private_key_at_derivation_path" -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Searching for derive_priv_ecdsa_for_master_seed usage ==="
rg "derive_priv_ecdsa_for_master_seed" -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Looking for similar private key derivation methods ==="
rg "private_key.*derivation" -A 2
Length of output: 5741
src/ui/wallet/wallets_screen/mod.rs (1)
117-117: LGTM: Wallet selection logic updated correctly.
The change from first() to values().next() properly aligns with the new BTreeMap-based wallet storage.
src/ui/identities/identities_screen.rs (1)
Line range hint 279-375: UI implementation looks good!
The implementation of the key display UI is well-structured and follows egui best practices. The code properly handles:
- Null checks using Option types
- Proper scoping of UI components
- Consistent spacing and layout
src/ui/identities/add_new_identity_screen/mod.rs (1)
91-91: Verify the impact of changing wallet selection method.
The change from wallets.first() to wallets.values().next() alters how the first wallet is accessed. While both methods retrieve the first wallet, they operate differently on the underlying data structure.
✅ Verification successful
The change to use values().next() is consistent with the codebase patterns
The codebase consistently uses wallets.values() to iterate over wallet collections across multiple files. The change from first() to values().next() aligns with this pattern, as evidenced by similar usage in:
src/ui/identities/top_up_identity_screen/mod.rssrc/ui/identities/identities_screen.rssrc/ui/wallet/wallets_screen/mod.rs- Other identity-related screens
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the wallet collection is used consistently across the codebase
# Search for wallet collection access patterns
rg -A 2 'wallets\.(first|values)'
Length of output: 3836
src/ui/identities/keys/key_info_screen.rs (1)
394-423: Message signing functionality correctly implemented
The render_sign_input method and associated message signing logic are correctly implemented, providing the intended functionality.
| &self, | ||
| app_context: &AppContext, | ||
| wallets: &[Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>], | ||
| wallets: &BTreeMap<WalletSeedHash, Arc<RwLock<Wallet>>>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing wallet association to avoid full map cloning
The current implementation clones the entire wallets map for each identity, which could be inefficient. The TODO comment correctly identifies this concern.
Consider these improvements:
- identity.associated_wallets = wallets.clone(); //todo: use less wallets
+ // Only associate wallets that are relevant to this identity
+ identity.associated_wallets = if let Some(wallet_index) = identity.wallet_index {
+ wallets.iter()
+ .filter(|(_, wallet)| {
+ // Add your filtering logic here based on wallet_index
+ // This is a placeholder - implement actual wallet matching logic
+ true
+ })
+ .map(|(k, v)| (k.clone(), v.clone()))
+ .collect()
+ } else {
+ BTreeMap::new()
+ };This approach would:
- Only associate relevant wallets with each identity
- Reduce memory usage by avoiding unnecessary cloning
- Improve performance for operations involving identity wallet associations
Please implement the appropriate filtering logic based on your wallet matching requirements.
Also applies to: 192-192
| let wallets: BTreeMap<_, _> = db | ||
| .get_wallets(&network) | ||
| .expect("expected to get wallets") | ||
| .into_iter() | ||
| .map(|w| Arc::new(RwLock::new(w))) | ||
| .map(|w| (w.seed_hash(), Arc::new(RwLock::new(w)))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider improving error handling in wallet initialization.
While the conversion to BTreeMap is implemented correctly, the use of expect could cause panic in production. Consider propagating the error instead.
- let wallets: BTreeMap<_, _> = db
- .get_wallets(&network)
- .expect("expected to get wallets")
+ let wallets: BTreeMap<_, _> = db
+ .get_wallets(&network)
+ .map_err(|e| {
+ eprintln!("Failed to get wallets: {}", e);
+ return None;
+ })?
.into_iter()
.map(|w| (w.seed_hash(), Arc::new(RwLock::new(w))))
.collect();Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| use crate::context::AppContext; | ||
| use crate::ui::components::top_panel::add_top_panel; | ||
| use crate::ui::ScreenLike; | ||
| use crate::ui::{wallet, ScreenLike}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The wallet import from ui module appears unused
The file imports wallet from crate::ui but only uses wallet-related types from crate::model::wallet. The ui::wallet module import appears to be unnecessary.
- Remove the unused
walletimport fromuse crate::ui::{wallet, ScreenLike};
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify usage of the wallet import
The wallet module is imported but doesn't appear to be used in the visible code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the wallet module is used in this file
rg -U "wallet::\w+" src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs
# Check if this is the only file importing the wallet module
rg "use crate::ui::\{.*wallet.*\}" --type rust
Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other usages of the wallet module that might be using different patterns
rg -U "wallet::" src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs
# Also check for any type declarations or patterns that might use the wallet module
ast-grep --pattern 'wallet::$_' src/ui/wallet/add_new_wallet_screen.rs
Length of output: 285
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential None value to avoid panics
In lines 230 and 258, unwrap() is called on self.selected_wallet.as_ref(). If self.selected_wallet is None, this will cause a panic. Consider gracefully handling the None case to enhance robustness.
Apply this diff to handle the None case:
- let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap();
+ if let Some(wallet_arc) = self.selected_wallet.as_ref() {
+ let wallet = wallet_arc.read().unwrap();
+ // existing code
+ } else {
+ ui.label("No wallet selected.");
+ return;
+ }Also applies to: 258-258
| if let Some(private_key) = self.decrypted_private_key { | ||
| let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif(); | ||
| ui.add( | ||
| TextEdit::multiline(&mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned()) | ||
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); | ||
| match wallet.private_key_at_derivation_path( | ||
| &derivation_path.derivation_path, | ||
| ) { | ||
| Ok(private_key) => { | ||
| let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif(); | ||
| ui.add( | ||
| TextEdit::multiline( | ||
| &mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned(), | ||
| ) | ||
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| self.decrypted_private_key = Some(private_key); | ||
| } | ||
| Err(e) => { | ||
| ui.label(format!("Error: {}", e)); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicated code into a helper function
The code blocks from lines 223-249 and 257-277 are nearly identical. Refactoring this repeated code into a helper function will adhere to the DRY principle and improve maintainability.
For example, create a helper method to retrieve and display the private key:
fn display_private_key(&mut self, ui: &mut egui::Ui, derivation_path: &DerivationPath) {
if let Some(private_key) = self.decrypted_private_key {
let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif();
ui.add(
TextEdit::multiline(&mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned())
.desired_width(f32::INFINITY),
);
} else if let Some(wallet_arc) = self.selected_wallet.as_ref() {
let wallet = wallet_arc.read().unwrap();
match wallet.private_key_at_derivation_path(&derivation_path.derivation_path) {
Ok(private_key) => {
let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif();
ui.add(
TextEdit::multiline(&mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned())
.desired_width(f32::INFINITY),
);
self.decrypted_private_key = Some(private_key);
}
Err(e) => {
ui.label(format!("Error: {}", e));
return;
}
}
} else {
ui.label("No wallet selected.");
return;
}
self.render_sign_input(ui);
}Then replace the duplicated code with calls to this helper method.
Also applies to: 257-277
| if let Some(private_key) = self.decrypted_private_key { | ||
| let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif(); | ||
| ui.add( | ||
| TextEdit::multiline(&mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned()) | ||
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); | ||
| match wallet.private_key_at_derivation_path( | ||
| &derivation_path.derivation_path, | ||
| ) { | ||
| Ok(private_key) => { | ||
| let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif(); | ||
| ui.add( | ||
| TextEdit::multiline( | ||
| &mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned(), | ||
| ) | ||
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| self.decrypted_private_key = Some(private_key); | ||
| } | ||
| Err(e) => { | ||
| ui.label(format!("Error: {}", e)); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| self.render_sign_input(ui); | ||
| } else if self.wallet_open { | ||
| ui.label("key is in encrypted wallet"); | ||
| if ui.button("view private key").clicked() { | ||
| self.view_private_key_even_if_encrypted_or_in_wallet = true; | ||
| self.view_wallet_unlock = true; | ||
| } | ||
| if self.decrypted_private_key.is_none() { | ||
| let wallet = self.selected_wallet.as_ref().unwrap().read().unwrap(); | ||
| match wallet.private_key_at_derivation_path( | ||
| &derivation_path.derivation_path, | ||
| ) { | ||
| Ok(private_key) => { | ||
| let private_key_wif = private_key.to_wif(); | ||
| ui.add( | ||
| TextEdit::multiline( | ||
| &mut private_key_wif.as_str().to_owned(), | ||
| ) | ||
| .desired_width(f32::INFINITY), | ||
| ); | ||
| self.decrypted_private_key = Some(private_key); | ||
| } | ||
| Err(e) => { | ||
| ui.label(format!("Error: {}", e)); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure secure handling when displaying private keys
Displaying private keys in the UI poses security risks. Ensure that the application securely handles private keys, possibly with confirmation dialogs or masking sensitive data, to prevent unintentional exposure.
Consider adding warnings or requiring additional user confirmation before displaying sensitive information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation