Skip to content

Remove reference to experimentalInteractiveRunEvents flag #6250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jkjustjoshing
Copy link

It looks like this flag doesn't exist at the link destination. I'm not 100% sure it's gone, but the docs link is dead.

I figured I'd submit this PR even though I'm not sure - if I'm correct, this can be approved and merged. If not, consider this a bug report and update the PR to reflect the true state of the flags.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 16, 2025

👷 Deploy request for cypress-docs pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6d1843b

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@cypress-app-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeMcC399
Copy link
Contributor

I suggest to close this PR as the experimental option experimentalInteractiveRunEvents is valid and should not be removed from the documentation.

@jkjustjoshing
Copy link
Author

Ah I understand. I saw experimentalRunAllSpecs on https://docs.cypress.io/app/references/configuration, which made me think that that page had experimental and non-experimental flags on it.

And honestly I didn't notice the "Experimental" section. Can I recommend a :target styling to highlight the linked-to section while navigating?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants