Skip to content

Conversation

webmaster128
Copy link
Member

@webmaster128 webmaster128 commented Dec 16, 2021

This partially reverts #804 (going back to our own implementation) and inlines much more bip39 functionality.

@webmaster128
Copy link
Member Author

This should reduce the bundle size a lot as seen in #904:
137797752-1822dba0-8fda-4116-91fc-693270c96b39

@JakeHartnell
Copy link
Contributor

What else is needed here? Would be great to reduce build size. How best to help get this out of Draft?

@webmaster128
Copy link
Member Author

This is basically ready. I just got side-tracked and did not consider this a release blocker for 0.27.0.

One thing I wanted to add is a pure-js implementation of pbkdf2 in order to support environments that do not have subtle or the Node.js crypto module. But we can also do a cry test and see if someone complains.

@webmaster128 webmaster128 added this to the 0.28.0 milestone Jan 16, 2022
@webmaster128 webmaster128 mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2022
@webmaster128 webmaster128 marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2022 23:01
@webmaster128 webmaster128 self-assigned this Feb 3, 2022
@webmaster128 webmaster128 merged commit 1fa0703 into main Feb 28, 2022
@webmaster128 webmaster128 deleted the re-implement-bip39 branch February 28, 2022 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants