Skip to content

labourer => laborer? #3127

@SimonVerhoeven

Description

@SimonVerhoeven

Currently, https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/blob/master/codespell_lib/data/dictionary_en-GB_to_en-US.txt contains:

labour->labor
laboured->labored
labours->labors

Wouldn't ideally labourer -> laborer and labourers -> laborer also be in there?

I'm happy to add them if you agree.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dictionaryChanges to the dictionary

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions