Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

📄 29% (0.29x) speedup for lcm in src/math/computation.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.07 milliseconds 827 microseconds (best of 224 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

Certainly! Here are the quick wins to make the program faster.

  • Move gcd function out of the lcm (it gets redefined every call, which is slow).
  • Use math.gcd from the standard library, which is implemented in C and thus much faster than a Python version.

Here’s the optimized program.

Notes:

  • The result will be identical to your version in all cases.
  • If you must use your own gcd, moving it global (outside) still gives you speedup.

But math.gcd is the fastest and simplest choice.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 3108 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 2 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.math.computation import lcm

# unit tests

# --------------------------
# 1. Basic Test Cases
# --------------------------

def test_lcm_simple_coprime():
    # Coprime numbers: lcm(4, 9) = 36
    codeflash_output = lcm(4, 9) # 750ns -> 667ns (12.4% faster)

def test_lcm_simple_non_coprime():
    # Non-coprime numbers: lcm(6, 8) = 24
    codeflash_output = lcm(6, 8) # 792ns -> 667ns (18.7% faster)

def test_lcm_equal_numbers():
    # Same numbers: lcm(7, 7) = 7
    codeflash_output = lcm(7, 7) # 667ns -> 542ns (23.1% faster)

def test_lcm_one_is_multiple_of_other():
    # One is a multiple of the other: lcm(5, 15) = 15
    codeflash_output = lcm(5, 15) # 709ns -> 625ns (13.4% faster)
    # Reverse order
    codeflash_output = lcm(15, 5) # 375ns -> 333ns (12.6% faster)

def test_lcm_with_one():
    # lcm with 1: lcm(1, 13) = 13
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, 13) # 750ns -> 625ns (20.0% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(13, 1) # 375ns -> 292ns (28.4% faster)

def test_lcm_with_zero():
    # lcm with zero: lcm(0, n) = 0 for any n
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, 5) # 292ns -> 167ns (74.9% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(7, 0) # 250ns -> 166ns (50.6% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, 0) # 208ns -> 125ns (66.4% faster)

# --------------------------
# 2. Edge Test Cases
# --------------------------

def test_lcm_negative_numbers():
    # Negative numbers: lcm(-3, 7) = 21
    codeflash_output = lcm(-3, 7) # 875ns -> 709ns (23.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(3, -7) # 708ns -> 583ns (21.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(-3, -7) # 458ns -> 417ns (9.83% faster)

def test_lcm_with_large_and_small():
    # Large and small: lcm(1, 999999937) = 999999937
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, 999999937) # 834ns -> 792ns (5.30% faster)

def test_lcm_prime_numbers():
    # Two large primes: lcm(101, 103) = 10403
    codeflash_output = lcm(101, 103) # 834ns -> 750ns (11.2% faster)

def test_lcm_negative_and_zero():
    # Negative and zero: lcm(-5, 0) = 0
    codeflash_output = lcm(-5, 0) # 333ns -> 208ns (60.1% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, -5) # 208ns -> 125ns (66.4% faster)

def test_lcm_one_negative_one_positive():
    # One negative, one positive: lcm(-8, 12) = 24
    codeflash_output = lcm(-8, 12) # 875ns -> 792ns (10.5% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(8, -12) # 583ns -> 500ns (16.6% faster)

def test_lcm_extreme_small_numbers():
    # Smallest nonzero values: lcm(1, -1) = 1
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, -1) # 667ns -> 542ns (23.1% faster)

def test_lcm_large_negative_numbers():
    # Large negative numbers: lcm(-1000000, -999999) = 999999000000
    codeflash_output = lcm(-1000000, -999999) # 1.00μs -> 875ns (14.3% faster)

def test_lcm_with_min_and_max_int():
    # Python ints are unbounded, but let's try large values
    a = 2**63 - 1  # large positive int
    b = 2**62      # another large int
    # Since they are coprime, lcm = a * b
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 1.33μs -> 1.25μs (6.64% faster)

def test_lcm_with_zero_and_negative_zero():
    # Zero and negative zero (should be treated the same)
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, -0) # 333ns -> 167ns (99.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(-0, 0) # 208ns -> 125ns (66.4% faster)

# --------------------------
# 3. Large Scale Test Cases
# --------------------------

def test_lcm_large_numbers():
    # Test with two large numbers
    a = 123456789012345678
    b = 987654321098765432
    # Compute expected lcm using the same logic
    def gcd(x, y):
        while y:
            x, y = y, x % y
        return x
    expected = abs(a * b) // gcd(a, b)
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 1.33μs -> 1.25μs (6.64% faster)

def test_lcm_large_prime_and_composite():
    # Large prime and large composite
    prime = 999999937  # large prime
    composite = 999999937 * 2
    codeflash_output = lcm(prime, composite) # 958ns -> 833ns (15.0% faster)

def test_lcm_many_pairs_performance():
    # Test many pairs to check performance and correctness
    # (but under 1000 iterations)
    for i in range(1, 1001):
        # lcm(i, i+1) = i*(i+1) since consecutive numbers are coprime
        codeflash_output = lcm(i, i+1) # 332μs -> 256μs (29.9% faster)

def test_lcm_large_negative_and_positive():
    # Large negative and large positive
    a = -987654321012345678
    b = 123456789098765432
    # Compute expected lcm
    def gcd(x, y):
        while y:
            x, y = y, x % y
        return x
    expected = abs(a * b) // gcd(a, b)
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 1.38μs -> 1.29μs (6.42% faster)

def test_lcm_large_power_of_two_and_odd():
    # Large power of two and odd number
    a = 2**50
    b = 999999999999
    # lcm should be a * b since they're coprime
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 2.17μs -> 2.17μs (0.046% faster)

def test_lcm_large_scale_with_ones():
    # lcm of 1 with many large numbers should be the number itself
    for n in [10**10, 10**12, 2**60, 999999999999]:
        codeflash_output = lcm(1, n) # 2.50μs -> 2.17μs (15.3% faster)
        codeflash_output = lcm(n, 1)

# --------------------------
# 4. Additional Robustness Tests
# --------------------------

@pytest.mark.parametrize("a,b,expected", [
    (0, 0, 0),
    (0, 5, 0),
    (5, 0, 0),
    (2, 3, 6),
    (-2, 3, 6),
    (2, -3, 6),
    (-2, -3, 6),
    (12, 15, 60),
    (15, 12, 60),
    (100, 10, 100),
    (10, 100, 100),
])
def test_lcm_various_cases(a, b, expected):
    # Parametrized test for various scenarios
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 7.46μs -> 6.00μs (24.3% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.math.computation import lcm

# unit tests

# === Basic Test Cases ===

def test_lcm_basic_positive_coprime():
    # Coprime numbers: LCM should be their product
    codeflash_output = lcm(3, 5) # 833ns -> 708ns (17.7% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(7, 11) # 542ns -> 459ns (18.1% faster)

def test_lcm_basic_positive_non_coprime():
    # Non-coprime numbers: LCM should be their least common multiple
    codeflash_output = lcm(4, 6) # 750ns -> 625ns (20.0% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(8, 12) # 417ns -> 375ns (11.2% faster)

def test_lcm_basic_one_is_multiple_of_other():
    # One number is a multiple of the other: LCM should be the larger
    codeflash_output = lcm(5, 15) # 709ns -> 625ns (13.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(21, 7) # 416ns -> 292ns (42.5% faster)

def test_lcm_basic_equal_numbers():
    # Equal numbers: LCM should be the number itself
    codeflash_output = lcm(9, 9) # 667ns -> 542ns (23.1% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(100, 100) # 458ns -> 375ns (22.1% faster)

def test_lcm_basic_with_one():
    # LCM with 1: should be the other number
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, 13) # 709ns -> 625ns (13.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, 1) # 375ns -> 292ns (28.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(17, 1) # 333ns -> 250ns (33.2% faster)

# === Edge Test Cases ===

def test_lcm_with_zero():
    # LCM with zero: should always be zero
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, 5) # 333ns -> 167ns (99.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(8, 0) # 250ns -> 166ns (50.6% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, 0) # 208ns -> 125ns (66.4% faster)

def test_lcm_with_negative_numbers():
    # LCM with negative numbers: should be positive
    codeflash_output = lcm(-3, 5) # 833ns -> 708ns (17.7% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(3, -5) # 500ns -> 458ns (9.17% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(-7, -11) # 750ns -> 666ns (12.6% faster)

def test_lcm_with_large_and_small():
    # Large and small numbers
    codeflash_output = lcm(1_000_000, 2) # 833ns -> 667ns (24.9% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(999_983, 2) # 542ns -> 458ns (18.3% faster)

def test_lcm_with_min_max_int():
    # Python ints are unbounded, but test large values
    big = 2**60
    small = 2**5
    codeflash_output = lcm(big, small) # 958ns -> 875ns (9.49% faster)
    # Test with negative big
    codeflash_output = lcm(-big, small) # 541ns -> 417ns (29.7% faster)
    # Test with both negative
    codeflash_output = lcm(-big, -small) # 583ns -> 458ns (27.3% faster)

def test_lcm_with_minimal_values():
    # Minimal non-zero values
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, 0) # 333ns -> 167ns (99.4% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(-1, 0) # 250ns -> 125ns (100% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(1, -1) # 583ns -> 500ns (16.6% faster)

def test_lcm_commutative_property():
    # LCM should be commutative: lcm(a, b) == lcm(b, a)
    for a, b in [(3, 5), (0, 7), (-4, 6), (123, 456)]:
        codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 2.29μs -> 1.96μs (17.1% faster)

def test_lcm_with_prime_numbers():
    # LCM of two distinct primes is their product
    codeflash_output = lcm(13, 17) # 792ns -> 667ns (18.7% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(2, 17) # 417ns -> 333ns (25.2% faster)

def test_lcm_with_negative_and_zero():
    # Negative and zero: should always be zero
    codeflash_output = lcm(-5, 0) # 333ns -> 208ns (60.1% faster)
    codeflash_output = lcm(0, -7) # 250ns -> 125ns (100% faster)

# === Large Scale Test Cases ===

def test_lcm_large_numbers():
    # Test with two large coprime numbers
    a = 999_999_937  # large prime
    b = 999_999_929  # another large prime
    expected = a * b
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 1.04μs -> 875ns (19.1% faster)

def test_lcm_large_numbers_with_common_factors():
    # Large numbers with a common factor
    a = 2**20 * 3**10
    b = 2**15 * 3**5 * 5**2
    # Their LCM should be the product of the highest powers of all primes
    expected = 2**20 * 3**10 * 5**2
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 1.04μs -> 917ns (13.6% faster)

def test_lcm_performance_many_pairs():
    # Test many pairs for performance and correctness
    for i in range(1, 1001):
        codeflash_output = lcm(i, i+1) # 337μs -> 264μs (27.7% faster)
        codeflash_output = lcm(i, 2*i)  # one is a multiple of the other

def test_lcm_large_negative_numbers():
    # Large negative numbers
    a = -2**30
    b = -2**28
    expected = 2**30
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 917ns -> 833ns (10.1% faster)

def test_lcm_large_and_one():
    # Large number and 1
    a = 10**18
    b = 1
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 917ns -> 833ns (10.1% faster)

def test_lcm_large_and_zero():
    # Large number and zero
    a = 10**18
    b = 0
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 333ns -> 208ns (60.1% faster)

# === Property-based and Special Case Tests ===

@pytest.mark.parametrize("a,b", [
    (0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (-1, 0), (0, -1),
    (999, 0), (0, 999)
])
def test_lcm_zero_property(a, b):
    # LCM with zero should always be zero
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 2.37μs -> 1.46μs (62.9% faster)

@pytest.mark.parametrize("a,b,expected", [
    (2, 4, 4),
    (6, 8, 24),
    (21, 6, 42),
    (18, 24, 72),
    (100, 25, 100),
    (25, 100, 100),
    (17, 19, 323),
    (-2, 4, 4),
    (2, -4, 4),
    (-2, -4, 4),
])
def test_lcm_various_known_values(a, b, expected):
    # Test a variety of known values, including negatives
    codeflash_output = lcm(a, b) # 8.13μs -> 6.83μs (18.9% faster)

def test_lcm_idempotent():
    # lcm(a, a) == abs(a)
    for a in [-100, -1, 0, 1, 100, 999999]:
        codeflash_output = lcm(a, a) # 2.79μs -> 2.25μs (24.1% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

from src.math.computation import lcm

def test_lcm():
    lcm(-39, -4)

def test_lcm_2():
    lcm(-1, 0)

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-lcm-mdgw6cav and push.

Codeflash

Certainly! Here are the quick wins to make the program faster.

- **Move `gcd` function out** of the `lcm` (it gets redefined every call, which is slow).
- Use `math.gcd` from the standard library, which is implemented in C and thus much faster than a Python version.

Here’s the optimized program.



**Notes:**
- The result will be **identical** to your version in all cases.
- If you must use your own `gcd`, moving it global (outside) still gives you speedup.



But `math.gcd` is the fastest and simplest choice.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Jul 24, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 July 24, 2025 04:28
@KRRT7 KRRT7 closed this Oct 28, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-lcm-mdgw6cav branch October 28, 2025 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants