Skip to content

Conversation

@syed-khadeerahmed
Copy link

@syed-khadeerahmed syed-khadeerahmed commented Oct 22, 2025

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Description

Have changed the break statement to fulfill the update completely.

Bug Fix: Wireless design: The break statement in the requested_profile.item() loop causes parameters to be skipped
Fix Implemented: Have changed the break statement to fulfill the update completely.

Testing Done:

  • [] Manual testing
  • [] Unit tests
  • [] Integration tests

Test cases covered: [Mention test case IDs or brief points]

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • All the sanity checks have been completed and the sanity test cases have been executed

Ansible Best Practices

  • Tasks are idempotent (can be run multiple times without changing state)
  • Variables and secrets are handled securely (e.g., using ansible-vault or environment variables)
  • Playbooks are modular and reusable
  • Handlers are used for actions that need to run on change

Documentation

  • All options and parameters are documented clearly.
  • Examples are provided and tested.
  • Notes and limitations are clearly stated.

Screenshots (if applicable)

Notes to Reviewers

@madhansansel madhansansel requested a review from rukapse October 27, 2025 17:14
@madhansansel
Copy link
Collaborator

@rukapse can you please review the code and update?

@madhansansel madhansansel merged commit 756c220 into cisco-en-programmability:main Nov 6, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants