-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 322
Persist Mask Values option #701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -647,6 +647,8 @@ void BitcoinGUI::setClientModel(ClientModel *_clientModel, interfaces::BlockAndH | |
| // initialize the disable state of the tray icon with the current value in the model. | ||
| trayIcon->setVisible(optionsModel->getShowTrayIcon()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| m_mask_values_action->setChecked(_clientModel->getOptionsModel()->getOption(OptionsModel::OptionID::MaskValues).toBool()); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also, you could just use There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Not an issue, will change if I need to retouch. |
||
| } else { | ||
| if(trayIconMenu) | ||
| { | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
accompanied with
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think @ryanofsky was recommending to remove the case from the
SettingsNamedue to its purpose of mappingOptionsModelto command line options but to addOptionsModel::MaksValues(or leave in this case as @achow101 already added them) tosetOptionandgetOption.The implementation of the getter looks simpler but then you would need to add the setter too to make it consistent and revert the above (remove the case from
setOptionandgetOption).Perhaps as a follow-up we could check the model consistent with either solution for the rest of settings (?).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I'll leave this as is since it's consistent with most of the other settings which use the generic function with the enum.