Fix outdated docstring of some RequestExt functions #524
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The PR #253 removed some of the `#[cfg(test)]` guards for a few functions which are useful in testing outside of the library. However the docstrings still stated that the test configuration was needed. This commit fixes the docstrings.
calavera
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
None added, trivial change
Description of changes:
The PR #253 removed some of the
#[cfg(test)]guards for a fewfunctions which are useful in testing outside of the library. However
the docstrings still stated that the test configuration was needed. This
commit fixes the docstrings.
By submitting this pull request