Skip to content

Increasing test timeouts and disabling stop tests #235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 7, 2023
Merged

Increasing test timeouts and disabling stop tests #235

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
d819a2f
Removing check for pending state
ananth102 Apr 6, 2023
a072646
Increased timeout, removed stop tests from canary
ananth102 Apr 6, 2023
77b994e
adding canary marker to training as well
ananth102 Apr 7, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
13 changes: 0 additions & 13 deletions test/e2e/tests/test_monitoring_schedule.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -165,19 +165,6 @@ def test_smoke(
monitoring_schedule_arn = monitoring_schedule_desc["MonitoringScheduleArn"]
assert k8s.get_resource_arn(resource) == monitoring_schedule_arn

# scheule transitions Pending -> Scheduled state
# Pending status is shortlived only for 30 seconds because baselining job has already been run
# remove the checks for Pending status if the test is flaky because of this
# as the main objective is to test for Scheduled status
# OR
# create the schedule with a on-going baseline job where it waits for the baselining job to complete
assert (
wait_resource_monitoring_schedule_status(
reference, self.STATUS_PENDING, 5, 2
)
== self.STATUS_PENDING
)
assert k8s.wait_on_condition(reference, "ACK.ResourceSynced", "False", 5, 2)

self._assert_monitoring_schedule_status_in_sync(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need to increase wait time for this check?

also can we do the same for feature group?

sagemaker_client, monitoring_schedule_name, reference, self.STATUS_SCHEDULED
Expand Down