Skip to content

Conversation

@make-github-pseudonymous-again
Copy link
Member

@make-github-pseudonymous-again make-github-pseudonymous-again commented Nov 9, 2021

  • Define test scripts
  • Define GitHub workflow(s): how do we cache builds across workflows? use actions/upload-artifact/actions/download-artifact.
  • Configure on-the-fly babel transpilation with {"node": "current"}.
  • Only load regenerator-runtime when needed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #205 (0755ea6) into main (26b069e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 0755ea6 differs from pull request most recent head 9bffb20. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9bffb20 to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #205   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           24        24           
  Lines          432       432           
=========================================
  Hits           432       432           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 26b069e...9bffb20. Read the comment docs.

Missing a GitHub workflow: how do we cache builds across workflows?
Probably needs `@node-loader/babel` with `{"node": "current"}` to be
generic. Would be nice to avoid loading `regenerator-runtime` when not
necessary.
@make-github-pseudonymous-again
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #218.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants