Support backwards compatible / un prefixed config options (`compression` rather than `parquet.compression`)

[alamb]

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Before #9382, DataFusion write configuration was inconsistent and different than the main configuration system and #9382 rationalized it ❤️

However, it also broke compatibility with old configuration and introduced some redundancy that can be annoying, as @devinjdangelo noted #9382 (review)

For example, to specify the compression type when writing parquet, after #9382 one needs to repeat 'parquet' to namespace the configuration options (format parquet and 'parquet.compression')

DataFusion CLI v36.0.0
❯ COPY (values (1)) TO 'test_files/scratch/copy/table/' (format parquet, 'compression' 'zstd(10)');

Invalid or Unsupported Configuration: could not find config namespace for key "compression"
❯ COPY (values (1)) TO 'test_files/scratch/copy/table/' (format parquet, 'parquet.compression' 'zstd(10)');
+-------+
| count |
+-------+
| 1     |
+-------+
1 row in set. Query took 0.024 seconds.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to introduce some backwards compatibility so when I write

COPY source_table TO 'test_files/scratch/copy/table/' (format parquet, 'compression' 'zstd(10)');

It means the same as

COPY source_table TO 'test_files/scratch/copy/table/' (format parquet, 'parquet.compression' 'zstd(10)');

Describe alternatives you've considered

I suggest we add some sort of special case code that tried to parse the option as normal, and if that failed, try with the different formats / prefixes

For example, if compression wasn't a valid option,

Additional context

No response

[alamb]

I think this would be a good first issue as it should be relatively straightforward and is a user visible behavior change.

The high level would be

1. Add a sqllogictest that reproduced the problem
2. Add the relevant special case code

[tinfoil-knight]

take

[alamb]

A subsequent PR renamed the prefix from parquet to format -- #9716 tracks removing the need to add format

Thanks for the analysis @tinfoil-knight #9594 (comment)