-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Closed
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
Currently, there are many duplicated code related to the visitor trait and rewrite trait. And the trait methods are sometimes misused.
Describe the solution you'd like
Combine the visitor and rewrite trait to be one trait TreeNode and provide common behavior for ExecutionPlan, PhysicalExpr, LogicalExpr, LogicalPlan. And this trait contains the following methods:
fn get_children(&self) -> Vec<Self>;for getting its childrenfn collect<F>(&self, op: &mut F) -> Result<()> where F: FnMut(&Self) -> Result<Recursion>,for collecting info from the tree node by a closurefn visit<V: TreeNodeVisitor<N = Self>>(&self, visitor: &mut V) -> Result<Recursion>for collecting info from the tree node by a visitor. This is used when need to collect info from a specificpost_visit. If onlypre_visitis needed, then thecollectmethod is preferred.fn transform_down<F>(self, op: &F) -> Result<Self> where F: Fn(Self) -> Result<Option<Self>>,for rewriting the node from top to downfn transform_up<F>(self, op: &F) -> Result<Self> where F: Fn(Self) -> Result<Option<Self>>,for rewriting the node from bottom to upfn rewrite<R: TreeNodeRewriter<N = Self>>(self, rewriter: &mut R) -> Result<Self>for rewriting the node from top to down. This is used when need to invoke a specificpre_visit. Otherwise, either thetransform_downortransform_upis preferred.fn map_children<F>(self, transform: F) -> Result<Self> where F: FnMut(Self) -> Result<Self>is for replacing all of its children with the rewritted ones
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request