-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Change some panics to errors in parquet decoder #8602
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
92473dd
Assorted panics we've found
rambleraptor ad8ee66
Update parquet/src/encodings/decoding.rs
rambleraptor 3a91747
Update parquet/src/file/reader.rs
rambleraptor 775bdda
PR comments
rambleraptor b223c81
add tests
rambleraptor 85e8b82
PR comments
rambleraptor 72e30b0
PR comments
rambleraptor 07983df
Fix clippy
rambleraptor File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is definitely an improvement over the existing code, but it opens a question:
Given that we're reading bytes from a byte buffer, it seems like we must expect to hit this situation at least occasionally? And the correct response is to fetch more bytes, not fail? Is there some mechanism for handling that higher up in the call stack? Or is there some reason it should be impossible for this code to run off the end of the buffer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also -- it seems like
read_num_bytesshould do bounds checking internally and returnOption<T>, so buffer overrun is obvious at the call site instead of a hidden panic footgun? The method has a half dozen other callers, and they all need to do manual bounds checking, in various ways and with varying degrees of safety. In particular, parquet/src/data_type.rs has two call sites that lack any visible bounds checks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this particular instance we're reading a buffer that should contain an entire page of data. If it doesn't, that likely points to a problem with the metadata.
Changes to
read_num_byteswould likely need more careful consideration as I suspect it might be used in some performance critical sections.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think changing
read_num_bytesto returnOptionwould be a good idea, as that would essentially replace theassertin that method. Thatassertis currently redundant if the caller already checks the bounds, so those two checks would be replaced by one against the option. In theBitReaderthat might actually improve performance.