Skip to content

Conversation

@millotp
Copy link
Collaborator

@millotp millotp commented Jan 21, 2025

🧭 What and Why

🎟 JIRA Ticket: DI-3350

fixes algolia/algoliasearch-client-ruby#509

@millotp millotp requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2025 09:25
@millotp millotp requested review from Fluf22 and morganleroi January 21, 2025 09:25
@millotp millotp self-assigned this Jan 21, 2025
@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Jan 21, 2025

💥 Breaking changes detected !!

Either this PR or a previous PR not released yet introduced breaking changes, be careful when merging.
You can find the details in the 'client java@17' CI job.

✔️ Code generated!

Name Link
🪓 Triggered by 4537e69abfdb0df83f3c39f0b2c2a6d21d3efdb4
🍃 Generated commit b0626a675649dc038784e96269d36a7ff82e5649
🌲 Generated branch generated/fix/ruby-object_id
📊 Benchmark results

Benchmarks performed on the method using a mock server, the results might not reflect the real-world performance.

Language Req/s
go 1655
javascript 1654
php 1499
csharp 1307
java 1135
python 1092
ruby 871
swift 753

DevinCodes
DevinCodes previously approved these changes Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fluf22 Fluf22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I hope this won't introduce too much conflicts in @shortcuts ' PR 😬

@millotp millotp merged commit b39fb53 into main Jan 21, 2025
28 checks passed
@millotp millotp deleted the fix/ruby-object_id branch January 21, 2025 13:16
algolia-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-ruby that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ruby 3.4.1: "warning: redefining 'object_id' may cause serious problems"

5 participants