-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Feat/l2deployment #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2f8dd40
Merge pull request #23 from agglayer/staging
ZeroEkkusu b1b4e90
feat: start work on LayerY deployment
simonDos 5aabba4
feat: deployLayerY WETH
simonDos fcec405
fix: allow claim on address(0)
simonDos 23e8c89
chore: prepare Katana deployment
simonDos c557e58
chore: fmt
simonDos 1eb9663
chore: corrections from review, docs
simonDos 2ec1745
feat: script RegisterNativeConverters
simonDos 575108d
fix: input.json corrections
simonDos cb188cb
chore: revert vbETH name change
simonDos File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dangerous breaking change, be careful.
Metadata changes are usually discouraged for every sovereign token. This is due to the fact that if it is sent to a non-upgradeable bridge version in a different network this getTokenMetadata(token) call at https://github.com/agglayer/agglayer-contracts/blob/v10.1.0-rc.5/contracts/v2/PolygonZkEVMBridgeV2.sol#L397 will produce a different token address in destination network as unexpected.
This seems safe for an already deployed "upgradeable token" deployed on Katana coming from a bridge from L1 (mainnet) as it will take tokenInfoHash.originToken but beware that if sent to a 3rd network (with non upgradeable tokens - 99% of them) then it will have side effects.
To avoid address change it is encouraged to use the same metadata.
Here the issue documented https://github.com/0xPolygonHermez/internal-audit/issues/160
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checking with the Product Team if the naming is crucial. If yes, we can override
name,symbol, anddecimalsfunctions to report different values to LxLy Bridge.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me put an example:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The solution I proposed fixes the issue because LxLy Bridge will see the original metadata, while everyone else will see the new metadata. So, the same bridge-wrapped token will be used no matter if you bridge from Ethereum or Katana.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@simonDos Per the internal discussions, revert the naming to
Vault Bridge ETH/vbETH.