Adding apartness relations and the beginnings of local rings and fields (II) #1718
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a follow-up from #1615 , in which I tried and failed a rebase and needed to start afresh.
Motivated by eventually having constructive Fields in the standard library, I've started to implement apartness relations, local rings, and heyting fields, largely based on
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/apartness+relation
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/local+ring#in_weak_foundations
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/field#constructive
Thanks again to @MatthewDaggitt for your careful review and patience. If there are any further things that need to be cleaned up, I'm happy to do so.