Skip to content

Conversation

cspollard
Copy link
Contributor

This is a follow-up from #1615 , in which I tried and failed a rebase and needed to start afresh.

Motivated by eventually having constructive Fields in the standard library, I've started to implement apartness relations, local rings, and heyting fields, largely based on

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/apartness+relation
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/local+ring#in_weak_foundations
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/field#constructive

Thanks again to @MatthewDaggitt for your careful review and patience. If there are any further things that need to be cleaned up, I'm happy to do so.

@MatthewDaggitt
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @cspollard! I've made some minor tweaks, the only major one is removing the private Iso definition by splitting the record field into two.

@MatthewDaggitt
Copy link
Contributor

Okay, merging in. Thanks again @cspollard! Thanks for sticking with it given the long process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants