Feat/failover labels #91
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the auto-labeling functionality by introducing the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Issue
participant LabelManager
participant ConfigLoader
User->>Issue: Create Issue without specific labels
Issue->>ConfigLoader: Load configuration
ConfigLoader->>LabelManager: Retrieve labels (including failover)
LabelManager-->>ConfigLoader: Return applicable labels
ConfigLoader-->>Issue: Apply labels (including failover labels if needed)
Issue->>User: Issue created with labels
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- action.yml (1 hunks)
- src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (3 hunks)
- src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts (1 hunks)
- src/runner.spec.ts (4 hunks)
- src/runner.ts (2 hunks)
- src/scraper/text.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scraper/text.ts (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
action.yml (1)
26-28: LGTM! The new input parameterfailover-labelsis well-integrated.The addition of the
failover-labelsparameter enhances the flexibility of the workflow by providing a fallback mechanism for labels.src/scraper/text.spec.ts (3)
10-10: LGTM! The function call simplification improves readability.The removal of the empty array argument for default labels streamlines the function's interface.
18-18: LGTM! The function call simplification improves readability.The removal of the empty array argument for default labels streamlines the function's interface.
28-28: LGTM! The function call simplification improves readability.The removal of the empty array argument for default labels streamlines the function's interface.
src/domain/getConfigFile.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! The new propertyfailoverLabelsis well-integrated.The addition of the
failoverLabelsproperty enhances the configuration structure by allowing for a fallback mechanism for labels.
20-20: LGTM! ThegetConfigFilefunction is correctly modified to includefailoverLabels.The modification ensures that the new configuration option is populated correctly and integrated into the overall configuration output.
Also applies to: 35-35
src/scraper/text.ts (2)
Line range hint
9-22:
LGTM! Conditional creation oflabelsRegexis correct.The changes ensure that
labelsRegexis only created iflabelsis not empty, preventing potential errors whenlabelsRegexisnull.
54-54: LGTM! Simplified return values ingetIssueLabels.The removal of
defaultLabelsand returning onlyselectedLabelssimplifies the function and aligns with the PR objectives.src/runner.ts (2)
25-26: LGTM! AddedfailoverLabelsto configuration retrieval.The addition of
failoverLabelsenhances the functionality by providing fallback labels when primary labels are absent.
56-61: LGTM! Improved label application logic.The changes ensure that issues are labeled more robustly by using
failoverLabelswhen no primary labels are found. The logging statements have been refined for clarity.src/domain/getLabelConfigs.ts (1)
52-52: LGTM! AddedfailoverLabelstoconfigObject.The inclusion of
failoverLabelsenhances the function's capability to handle more complex label configurations.src/runner.spec.ts (3)
30-30: LGTM!The dynamic assignment of
getRepoLabelsenhances the flexibility of the test cases.
32-33: LGTM!The mocks for
addLabelsandgetRepoLabelsare appropriate for isolating therunfunction during testing.
49-49: LGTM!The updated assertion ensures that the correct arguments are passed to
addLabelsSpy.README.md (4)
69-69: LGTM!The
include-titleoption allows users to include or exclude the title in the labels search.
71-71: LGTM!The
failover-labelsoption specifies labels to be applied when no labels are found in the issue text.
226-236: LGTM!The
Include Titlesection provides clear instructions on how to use theinclude-titleoption.
245-265: LGTM!The
Failover Labelssection provides clear instructions on how to use thefailover-labelsoption.
closes #18
document #24