Skip to content

Conversation

@dbasunag
Copy link
Contributor

@dbasunag dbasunag commented Jan 28, 2025

Short description:
More details:
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for reviewer:
Bug:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated the clean_up method in NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy to properly return the result of the superclass method.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the clean_up method in the NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy class within the ocp_resources/node_network_configuration_policy.py file. The change involves returning the result of the superclass's clean_up() method, which was previously called without capturing its return value. This adjustment ensures that the return value from the parent class's cleanup process is properly propagated.

Changes

File Change Summary
ocp_resources/node_network_configuration_policy.py Updated clean_up() method to return the result of super().clean_up()

Suggested reviewers

  • myakove
  • rnetser
  • omrirh

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 514f8f5 and b04a6d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ocp_resources/node_network_configuration_policy.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: tox
  • GitHub Check: python-module-install
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ocp_resources/node_network_configuration_policy.py (1)

315-315: LGTM! Verify impact on callers.

Good change to propagate the parent's cleanup status. This improves the method's behavior by ensuring cleanup results are properly communicated to callers.

Let's verify the impact on callers:

✅ Verification successful

Change is safe to proceed with ✅

The modification correctly propagates the parent's cleanup status. The only caller found in examples treats it as a void operation, and there are no derived classes that could be affected. The change is backward compatible as the parent method always returned a boolean.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find callers of clean_up method to assess impact
# Look for direct method calls and super() calls

# Search for direct clean_up calls on NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy instances
rg -l "NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy" | xargs rg "\.clean_up\(\)"

# Search for potential parent class references
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ (NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy)'

Length of output: 281


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get parent class implementation and example usage

# Find the parent class
rg -B 5 -A 10 "class NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy" ocp_resources/node_network_configuration_policy.py

# Check example usage context
rg -B 5 -A 5 "clean_up\(\)" examples/node_network_configuration_policy.py

Length of output: 728


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find Resource class's clean_up implementation
rg -B 2 -A 5 "def clean_up" ocp_resources/resource.py

Length of output: 306

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rh-bot-1
Copy link

Report bugs in Issues

The following are automatically added:

  • Add reviewers from OWNER file (in the root of the repository) under reviewers section.
  • Set PR size label.
  • New issue is created for the PR. (Closed when PR is merged/closed)
  • Run pre-commit if .pre-commit-config.yaml exists in the repo.

Available user actions:

  • To mark PR as WIP comment /wip to the PR, To remove it from the PR comment /wip cancel to the PR.
  • To block merging of PR comment /hold, To un-block merging of PR comment /hold cancel.
  • To mark PR as verified comment /verified to the PR, to un-verify comment /verified cancel to the PR.
    verified label removed on each new commit push.
  • To cherry pick a merged PR comment /cherry-pick <target branch to cherry-pick to> in the PR.
    • Multiple target branches can be cherry-picked, separated by spaces. (/cherry-pick branch1 branch2)
    • Cherry-pick will be started when PR is merged
  • To build and push container image command /build-and-push-container in the PR (tag will be the PR number).
    • You can add extra args to the Podman build command
      • Example: /build-and-push-container --build-arg OPENSHIFT_PYTHON_WRAPPER_COMMIT=<commit_hash>
  • To add a label by comment use /<label name>, to remove, use /<label name> cancel
  • To assign reviewers based on OWNERS file use /assign-reviewers
  • To check if PR can be merged use /check-can-merge
  • to assign reviewer to PR use /assign-reviewer @<reviewer>
Supported /retest check runs
  • /retest tox: Retest tox
  • /retest python-module-install: Retest python-module-install
  • /retest all: Retest all
Supported labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm

@rh-bot-1 rh-bot-1 requested a review from rnetser January 28, 2025 17:27
@rh-bot-1 rh-bot-1 requested a review from myakove January 28, 2025 17:27
@dbasunag dbasunag changed the title update to clean_up() call update to clean_up() call in node_network_configuration_policy.py Jan 28, 2025
@dbasunag
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified

@myakove myakove merged commit 67dbf84 into main Jan 28, 2025
6 checks passed
@myakove myakove deleted the nncp_cleanup branch January 28, 2025 20:04
myakove pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants