You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An image of 2 glass spheres is presented immediately prior to Section 10.3, and then in Section 10.3, Total Internal Reflection, it starts off by saying:
That doesn't look right.
and then a new image is presented, which (randomly) changes the center sphere to blue and removes the fuzz on the right sphere.
The presentation flows like, "look at this image, ok it doesn't look right, then ok here's a new thing to consider (total internal reflection), and now look at the new image."
But that doesn't appear to be what was intended. Instead, we're introduced to total internal reflection, which doesn't even seem to appear in either image (as the left sphere appears the same in both images). The obvious thing to look for in the second image is some kind of improvement in the left sphere, after the discussion of TIR, but instead there's just those random 2 unrelated changes mentioned above.
The first image is captioned with "Glass sphere that always refracts", while the second says "Glass sphere that sometimes refracts", and yet the left sphere in both images appears identical. I don't understand what the author intended to convey here.