Fix grammar, spelling, and style issues across documentation files #158
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rmccreath
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
Posit Infrastructure/Quick guide to your Posit Workbench session.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
rmccreath
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
Posit Infrastructure/Quick guide to your Posit Workbench session.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…on.md Co-authored-by: Russell McCreath <[email protected]>
rmccreath
reviewed
Oct 2, 2025
…on.md Co-authored-by: Russell McCreath <[email protected]>
rmccreath
approved these changes
Oct 2, 2025
Moohan
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR, fixes typos, corrects grammar and improves the wording across the technical docs.
I had the GitHub Copilot Pro free trial last month, and (amongst other things), I used the agent mode to review and correct the docs in this repo. I did this on my fork, where I also have CodeRabbit turned on for automatic PR code reviews. You can see the full history here: Moohan#1 but I squashed those commits for this PR to make the history cleaner.
@terrymclaughlin / @rmccreath I know GitHub Copilot is on the agenda to be tested at some point, but I would also suggest Coderabbit - It's free for public repos, so could be used for zero cost and I think very low risk (since the code is already fully public), it really does a fantastic job of reviewing code, with accurate and readable comments and often directly commitable suggestions. I think it would be an easy win to improve the code quality and reduce mistakes for any teams/projects already coding publicly on GitHub.