All public methods and classes have clear and concise docstrings.

[Phillyclause89]

Issue: Ensure Clear and Concise Docstrings for All Public Methods and Classes

The goal of this issue is to review and improve the docstrings across the repository to ensure they are:

• Clear: Easy to understand, even for developers who are new to the project.
• Concise: Free of unnecessary details while still being informative.
• Consistent: Following a uniform style and format (e.g., adhering to PEP 257 or Google-style docstrings).

---

Tasks:

1. Review Existing Docstrings:

   • Evaluate all public methods and classes to ensure their docstrings are clear and concise.
   • Look for any missing parameters, return types, or unclear explanations.

2. Update Docstrings Where Needed:

   • Ensure docstrings provide the following details:
     • Purpose of the method/class.
     • Parameters with types and descriptions.
     • Return values with types and descriptions (if applicable).
     • Examples of usage (if applicable or helpful).

3. Establish Consistency:

   • Adopt a consistent style across the project (e.g., Google-style or NumPy-style docstrings).
   • Update any outdated or inconsistent formatting.

4. Optional Improvements:

   • Add examples to docstrings where they are likely to be helpful.
   • Ensure edge cases and warnings are documented.

---

Notes:

• The current docstrings were collaboratively written with the help of ChatGPT and appear to meet the intended clarity and conciseness for now. This issue may be revisited in the future if the project grows or if new team members suggest improvements.
• Any suggestions or feedback for further improving the docstrings can be captured here for future reference.

[Phillyclause89]

docstrings for the members I care about are about as fleshed out as they are going to get...

If anyone feels there are specific areas where further improvements are required, feel free to open a new issue with detailed suggestions.