Skip to content

Conversation

@tamararivera
Copy link
Member

This PR improves the documentation on how to set up ServiceControl when using Windows failover cluster and MSMQ

This PR improves the documentation on how to set up ServiceControl when using Windows failover cluster and MSMQ
@tamararivera tamararivera self-assigned this Oct 23, 2025
| **SCMU field** | N/A |

| Environment/Installation type | Type | Default value |
|---|---|---|
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed this table was broken, so I took the time to fix it.

## Basic setup
> [!NOTE]
> ServiceControl only supports active/passive clusters. Clustering might not be required as cloud hosting and enterprise virtualization layers provide high availability and data redundancy features and message queueing ensures no messages are lost.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I moved this note because it didn't flow correctly at the top.
More importantly, do we need the two sentences after the first one? There are trying to justify why clustering is not needed, but I don't see how that is relevant here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants