-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 300
Improve documentation around Windows failover cluster and MSMQ #7881
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This PR improves the documentation on how to set up ServiceControl when using Windows failover cluster and MSMQ
| | **SCMU field** | N/A | | ||
|
|
||
| | Environment/Installation type | Type | Default value | | ||
| |---|---|---| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I noticed this table was broken, so I took the time to fix it.
| ## Basic setup | ||
| > [!NOTE] | ||
| > ServiceControl only supports active/passive clusters. Clustering might not be required as cloud hosting and enterprise virtualization layers provide high availability and data redundancy features and message queueing ensures no messages are lost. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I moved this note because it didn't flow correctly at the top.
More importantly, do we need the two sentences after the first one? There are trying to justify why clustering is not needed, but I don't see how that is relevant here
This PR improves the documentation on how to set up ServiceControl when using Windows failover cluster and MSMQ