Try to document relative icons

[DHowett]

No description provided.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 56b3ced:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
TerminalDocs/command-palette.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/actions.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/appearance.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/profile-appearance.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/profile-general.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/json-fragment-extensions.md	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

[DHowett]

@crramirez does this seem sensible? i think I'm in too deep

[crramirez]

Looks very very good. Thanks a lot for this. I'll try this weekend to compile it and give it a try.

Now that you are in the context, I have a related question. How doable is to specify flags into the icon's name to choose different ones depending on the dark/light theme as XAML (resource management) does? I have two apps that I have to modify the icons via the app to match the theme, but i cannot guess the terminal menu theme. Example:

Can you pick the right one depending on the theme?

If you say that it is doable, I'll create a descriptive issue requesting it.

Thanks a lot again for your hard work. (I've seen the lot of commits)

[DHowett]

Hmmmm... that might require some lifting, but it seems doable.

If you want to try out the latest, it came out in last night's Canary build (https://aka.ms/terminal-canary-installer)!

[crramirez]

wow I don't need to compile it? amazing. The last one and a leave you alone (for a while)

If I have an ico file with the following images ALL PNGs with the following sizes:

• 16 × 16 px
• 24 × 24 px
• 32 × 32 px
• 48 × 48 px
• 64 × 64 px
• 128 × 128 px
• 256 × 256 px

Will be possible that terminal pick the right one depending on the Display scale? Currently I think it is picking the 256 size and reducing it:

Again, I can create a separate issue for that.

[DHowett]

@crramirez 😢 this is expected to work but once again we have been let down by WinUI

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit a908a29:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
TerminalDocs/command-palette.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/actions.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/appearance.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/profile-appearance.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/customize-settings/profile-general.md	✅Succeeded	View
TerminalDocs/json-fragment-extensions.md	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

[crramirez]

Ok @DHowett I'll do the proper testing in the canary build and create an issue if I see something.

BTW, the new SSH entries rocks!!!!

[DHowett]

Oh, thanks so much! @carlos-zamora will be happy to hear that. We're still trying to figure out what to do about them in general. Some folks will have lots, and we may want to put them in a folder.

FWIW, I was against having them at all. My ssh config is for my own use, not as a list of "places I want surfaced in an application". 🤷🏻

[crramirez]

Happily for you also the extension management was implemented so you just have to disable the ssh extension :-D