Skip to content

Django 1.9+ compatibility #42

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2017
Merged

Django 1.9+ compatibility #42

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2017

Conversation

kjagiello
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kjagiello kjagiello force-pushed the forks/fcurella/enum34 branch 6 times, most recently from 7e9388c to 48ca600 Compare June 19, 2017 14:32
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling 48ca600 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling 48ca600 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@kjagiello kjagiello force-pushed the forks/fcurella/enum34 branch from 48ca600 to 3ed88a9 Compare June 19, 2017 15:09
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling 3ed88a9 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling 3ed88a9 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@kjagiello kjagiello force-pushed the forks/fcurella/enum34 branch from 3ed88a9 to fd99515 Compare June 19, 2017 18:05
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling 3ed88a9 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@kjagiello kjagiello force-pushed the forks/fcurella/enum34 branch from fd99515 to dbae879 Compare June 20, 2017 07:48
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.2%) to 91.852% when pulling dbae879 on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 92.199% when pulling ede931b on kjagiello:forks/fcurella/enum34 into c803abf on 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34.

@kjagiello kjagiello mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2017
Merged
@kjagiello kjagiello changed the title Run tests against Django 1.9+ Django 1.9+ compatibility Jun 20, 2017
@kjagiello kjagiello merged commit f5571f8 into 5monkeys:forks/fcurella/enum34 Jun 27, 2017
@ashkulz ashkulz mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2017
Merged
Swamii added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2018
@Swamii
Merge pull request #43 from advarisk/port_pr42
483cc41 
port PR #42 for Django 1.10 compatibility

Thanks @ashkulz
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kjagiello @coveralls