Auto merge of #126698 - Oneirical:tessteract, r=<try>

Migrate `unknown-mod-stdin`, `issue-68794-textrel-on-minimal-lib`, `raw-dylib-cross-compilation` and `used-cdylib-macos` `run-make` tests to rmake

Part of #121876 and the associated [Google Summer of Code project](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/05/01/gsoc-2024-selected-projects.html).

Seriously needs OSX/Windows try-jobs. If it fails, restore `only-linux` in `textrel-on-minimal-lib` and try again.

try-job: dist-x86_64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc

Author: bors

src/tools/tidy/src/allowed_run_make_makefiles.txt

@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ run-make/issue-37839/Makefile
 run-make/issue-40535/Makefile
 run-make/issue-47384/Makefile
 run-make/issue-47551/Makefile
-run-make/issue-68794-textrel-on-minimal-lib/Makefile
 run-make/issue-69368/Makefile
 run-make/issue-83045/Makefile
 run-make/issue-83112-incr-test-moved-file/Makefile
@@ -158,7 +157,6 @@ run-make/profile/Makefile
 run-make/prune-link-args/Makefile
 run-make/raw-dylib-alt-calling-convention/Makefile
 run-make/raw-dylib-c/Makefile
-run-make/raw-dylib-cross-compilation/Makefile
 run-make/raw-dylib-custom-dlltool/Makefile
 run-make/raw-dylib-import-name-type/Makefile
 run-make/raw-dylib-inline-cross-dylib/Makefile
@@ -212,10 +210,8 @@ run-make/track-path-dep-info/Makefile
 run-make/track-pgo-dep-info/Makefile
 run-make/translation/Makefile
 run-make/type-mismatch-same-crate-name/Makefile
-run-make/unknown-mod-stdin/Makefile
 run-make/unstable-flag-required/Makefile
 run-make/use-suggestions-rust-2018/Makefile
-run-make/used-cdylib-macos/Makefile
 run-make/volatile-intrinsics/Makefile
 run-make/wasm-exceptions-nostd/Makefile
 run-make/wasm-override-linker/Makefile

tests/run-make/issue-68794-textrel-on-minimal-lib/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// When cross-compiling using `raw-dylib`, rustc would try to fetch some
+// very specific `dlltool` to complete the cross-compilation (such as `i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool`)
+// when Windows only calls it `dlltool`. This test performs some cross-compilation in a
+// way that previously failed due to this bug, and checks that it succeeds.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108355
+
+//@ ignore-i686-pc-windows-msvc
+// Reason: dlltool on this distribution is unable to produce x64 binaries
+//@ needs-dlltool
+// Reason: this is the utility being checked by this test
+
+use run_make_support::{llvm_objdump, rust_lib_name, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    // Build as x86 and make sure that we have x86 objects only.
+    rustc()
+        .crate_type("lib")
+        .crate_name("i686_raw_dylib_test")
+        .target("i686-pc-windows-gnu")
+        .input("lib.rs")
+        .run();
+    llvm_objdump()
+        .arg("-a")
+        .input(rust_lib_name("i686_raw_dylib_test"))
+        .run()
+        .assert_stdout_contains("file format coff-i386")
+        .assert_stdout_not_contains("file format coff-x86-64");
+    // Build as x64 and make sure that we have x64 objects only.
+    rustc()
+        .crate_type("lib")
+        .crate_name("x64_raw_dylib_test")
+        .target("x86-64-pc-windows-gnu")
+        .input("lib.rs")
+        .run();
+    llvm_objdump()
+        .arg("-a")
+        .input(rust_lib_name("i686_raw_dylib_test"))
+        .run()
+        .assert_stdout_not_contains("file format coff-i386")
+        .assert_stdout_contains("file format coff-x86-64");
+}

tests/run-make/raw-dylib-cross-compilation/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// Verify that no text relocations are accidentally introduced by linking a
+// minimal rust staticlib.
+// The test links a rust static library into a shared library, and checks that
+// the linker doesn't have to flag the resulting file as containing TEXTRELs.
+// This bug otherwise breaks Android builds, which forbid TEXTRELs.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68794
+
+//@ ignore-cross-compile
+//FIXME(Oneirical): check that it works on more than just only-linux
+
+use run_make_support::{
+    cc, dynamic_lib_name, extra_c_flags, extra_cxx_flags, llvm_readobj, rustc, static_lib_name,
+};
+
+fn main() {
+    rustc().input("foo.rs").run();
+    cc().input("bar.c")
+        .input(static_lib_name("foo"))
+        .out_exe(&dynamic_lib_name("bar"))
+        .arg("-fPIC")
+        .arg("-shared")
+        .args(&extra_c_flags())
+        .args(&extra_cxx_flags())
+        .run();
+    llvm_readobj()
+        .input(dynamic_lib_name("bar"))
+        .arg("--dynamic")
+        .run()
+        .assert_stdout_not_contains("TEXTREL");
+}

tests/run-make/raw-dylib-cross-compilation/rmake.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// Rustc displays a compilation error when it finds a `mod` (module)
+// statement referencing a file that does not exist. However, a bug from 2019
+// caused invalid `mod` statements to silently insert empty inline modules
+// instead of showing an error if the invalid `mod` statement had been passed
+// through standard input. This test checks that this bug does not make a resurgence.
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65601
+
+// NOTE: This is not a UI test, because the bug which this test
+// is checking for is specifically tied to passing
+// `mod unknown;` through standard input.
+
+use run_make_support::{diff, rustc};
+
+fn main() {
+    let out = rustc().crate_type("rlib").stdin(b"mod unknown;").arg("-").run_fail();
+    diff()
+        .actual_text("actual-stdout", out.stdout_utf8())
+        .expected_file("unknown-mod.stdout")
+        .run();
+    diff()
+        .actual_text("actual-stderr", out.stderr_utf8())
+        .expected_file("unknown-mod.stderr")
+        .normalize(r#"\\"#, "/")
+        .run();
+}