Skip to content

Conversation

@nateprewitt
Copy link
Member

2.28.1 (2022-06-29)

Improvements

Dependencies

@nateprewitt
Copy link
Member Author

I'm deferring the decisions on #6159 and #6167 until we see larger data points. They have 5 and 2 user engagements respectively which seems very low for the current 2.28.x adoption rate. For the time being, there are straight forward workarounds for both.

Copy link
Member

@sethmlarson sethmlarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, let's ship it! :shipit:

@nateprewitt nateprewitt merged commit 4d39457 into psf:main Jun 29, 2022
@nateprewitt nateprewitt deleted the v2.28.1 branch June 29, 2022 15:09
@afriedma
Copy link

afriedma commented Nov 17, 2022

I'm deferring the decisions on #6159 and #6167 until we see larger data points. They have 5 and 2 user engagements respectively which seems very low for the current 2.28.x adoption rate. For the time being, there are straight forward workarounds for both.

Hi, what is the workaround for #6167? I am adding ":authority" and the request fails @nateprewitt

@nateprewitt
Copy link
Member Author

@afriedma please keep conversations constrained to relevant issues. I believe this was already answered in the other issue you commented on. If you're unfamiliar with PreparedRequests, you can find them in our documentation.

@psf psf locked as off-topic and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants