-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.7k
Description
Version
20.8.1
Platform
Linux ushanka-housing 6.5.0-1020-oem #21-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Apr 3 14:54:32 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
cpu-prof
What steps will reproduce the bug?
You can reproduce this by modifying one of the existent node tests.
If you edit tests/fixtures/workload/fibonacci-worker.js in this repo with
-new Worker(path.join(__dirname, 'fibonacci.js'));
+new Worker(path.join(__dirname, 'fibonacci.js'), {env: process.env});and then run
node ./test/sequential/test-cpu-prof-dir-worker.js
the new test will fail
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
This should reproduce 100% of the time -- you don't need to do anything special
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
According to https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v20.x/api/worker_threads.html#new-workerfilename-options, the default value for a worker thread's env is process.env. Thus, not passing an environment and passing process.env as the environment should always produce the same behavior.
What do you see instead?
When running in its original form, the test produces two profile files, as intended. When passing {env: process.env} into the worker invocation, however, it only produces one profile file.
Additional information
If I print the environment in the worker thread, it appears to be identical in both cases. It doesn't seem like the problem is that part of the environment is getting lost, but rather there's some hidden variable that isn't getting propagated