[AArch64] Fix a presumed typo in isFPImmLegal limit. NFC (llvm#106716)

The worst possible case for a double literal goes like:

```
  mov ...
  movk ..., lsl rust-lang#16
  movk ..., lsl rust-lang#32
  movk ..., lsl rust-lang#48
  fmov ...
```

The limit of 5 in the code gives the impression that `Insn` includes all
instructions including the `fmov`, but that's not true. It only counts
the integer moves. This led me astray on some other work in this area.

Author: citymarina

llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp

@@ -11463,7 +11463,9 @@ bool AArch64TargetLowering::isFPImmLegal(const APFloat &Imm, EVT VT,
     // movw+movk is fused). So we limit up to 2 instrdduction at most.
     SmallVector<AArch64_IMM::ImmInsnModel, 4> Insn;
     AArch64_IMM::expandMOVImm(ImmInt.getZExtValue(), VT.getSizeInBits(), Insn);
-    unsigned Limit = (OptForSize ? 1 : (Subtarget->hasFuseLiterals() ? 5 : 2));
+    assert(Insn.size() <= 4 &&
+           "Should be able to build any value with at most 4 moves");
+    unsigned Limit = (OptForSize ? 1 : (Subtarget->hasFuseLiterals() ? 4 : 2));
     IsLegal = Insn.size() <= Limit;
   }