Rollup merge of rust-lang#108694 - est31:backticks_matchmaking_comments, r=Nilstrieb

Match unmatched backticks in compiler/ comments

r? ``@Nilstrieb`` as per [advice](rust-lang#108685 (comment))

Author: matthiaskrgr

compiler/rustc_ast/src/util/parser.rs

@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ impl AssocOp {
             AssignOp(_) | // `{ 42 } +=`
             As | // `{ 42 } as usize`
             // Equal | // `{ 42 } == { 42 }`    Accepting these here would regress incorrect
-            // NotEqual | // `{ 42 } != { 42 }  struct literals parser recovery.
+            // NotEqual | // `{ 42 } != { 42 }` struct literals parser recovery.
             Colon, // `{ 42 }: usize`
         )
     }

compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/lib.rs

@@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ impl<'a, 'hir> LoweringContext<'a, 'hir> {
         hir::OwnerNode::Item(self.arena.alloc(opaque_ty_item))
     }
 
-    /// Given a `parent_def_id`, a list of `lifetimes_in_bounds and a `remapping` hash to be
+    /// Given a `parent_def_id`, a list of `lifetimes_in_bounds` and a `remapping` hash to be
     /// filled, this function creates new definitions for `Param` and `Fresh` lifetimes, inserts the
     /// new definition, adds it to the remapping with the definition of the given lifetime and
     /// returns a list of lifetimes to be lowered afterwards.

compiler/rustc_ast_passes/src/ast_validation.rs

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ impl<'a> AstValidator<'a> {
                 // We allow these:
                 //  - `Option<impl Trait>`
                 //  - `option::Option<impl Trait>`
-                //  - `option::Option<T>::Foo<impl Trait>
+                //  - `option::Option<T>::Foo<impl Trait>`
                 //
                 // But not these:
                 //  - `<impl Trait>::Foo`

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/diagnostics/region_errors.rs

@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
     /// fn foo<'a, 'b>(x: &'a u32) -> &'b u32 { x }
     /// ```
     ///
-    /// Here we would be invoked with `fr = 'a` and `outlived_fr = `'b`.
+    /// Here we would be invoked with `fr = 'a` and `outlived_fr = 'b`.
     pub(crate) fn report_region_error(
         &mut self,
         fr: RegionVid,

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs

@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ impl<'tcx> RegionInferenceContext<'tcx> {
     /// from a universe it can't name; at present, the only way for
     /// this to be true is if `scc` outlives `'static`. This is
     /// actually stricter than necessary: ideally, we'd support bounds
-    /// like `for<'a: 'b`>` that might then allow us to approximate
+    /// like `for<'a: 'b>` that might then allow us to approximate
     /// `'a` with `'b` and not `'static`. But it will have to do for
     /// now.
     fn add_incompatible_universe(&mut self, scc: ConstraintSccIndex) {

compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/values.rs

@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ pub(crate) struct RegionValues<N: Idx> {
     free_regions: SparseBitMatrix<N, RegionVid>,
 
     /// Placeholders represent bound regions -- so something like `'a`
-    /// in for<'a> fn(&'a u32)`.
+    /// in `for<'a> fn(&'a u32)`.
     placeholders: SparseBitMatrix<N, PlaceholderIndex>,
 }
 

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/compare_impl_item.rs

@@ -1873,7 +1873,7 @@ pub(super) fn check_type_bounds<'tcx>(
     //     type Bar<C> =...
     // }
     //
-    // - `impl_trait_ref` would be `<(A, B) as Foo<u32>>
+    // - `impl_trait_ref` would be `<(A, B) as Foo<u32>>`
     // - `impl_ty_substs` would be `[A, B, ^0.0]` (`^0.0` here is the bound var with db 0 and index 0)
     // - `rebased_substs` would be `[(A, B), u32, ^0.0]`, combining the substs from
     //    the *trait* with the generic associated type parameters (as bound vars).

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/coherence/builtin.rs

@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ pub fn coerce_unsized_info<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, impl_did: DefId) -> CoerceUn
             }
 
             // Here we are considering a case of converting
-            // `S<P0...Pn>` to S<Q0...Qn>`. As an example, let's imagine a struct `Foo<T, U>`,
+            // `S<P0...Pn>` to `S<Q0...Qn>`. As an example, let's imagine a struct `Foo<T, U>`,
             // which acts like a pointer to `U`, but carries along some extra data of type `T`:
             //
             //     struct Foo<T, U> {

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/mem_categorization.rs

@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MemCategorizationContext<'a, 'tcx> {
         // `&&Some(x,)` `place_foo`
         //  `&Some(x,)` `deref { place_foo}`
         //   `Some(x,)` `deref { deref { place_foo }}`
-        //        (x,)` `field0 { deref { deref { place_foo }}}` <- resulting place
+        //       `(x,)` `field0 { deref { deref { place_foo }}}` <- resulting place
         //
         // The above example has no adjustments. If the code were instead the (after adjustments,
         // equivalent) version

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/upvar.rs

@@ -2223,7 +2223,7 @@ fn determine_place_ancestry_relation<'tcx>(
 ///     || drop(&*m.a.field_of_a)
 ///     // Here we really do want to capture `*m.a` because that outlives `'static`
 ///
-///     // If we capture `m`, then the closure no longer outlives `'static'
+///     // If we capture `m`, then the closure no longer outlives `'static`
 ///     // it is constrained to `'a`
 /// }
 /// ```