-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
Rails 4.2 #655
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The Rails 4.2 dummy app is not backwards compatible anymore. Rails and Semver \o/
Rails 4.2 complains about params having mixed stringified and symbolized keys.
Conflicts: app/controllers/alchemy/contents_controller.rb spec/libraries/resource_spec.rb
Rails 4.2 was released on Dec 19th, any news on this? |
Conflicts: app/controllers/alchemy/pages_controller.rb
To hvae respond_to and respond_with back.
The JSON api moved into it's own namespace.
The tests are passing now. But we have a lots of deprecations I would like to address before we merge this. @gabrielrios please test the gem 'alchemy_cms', github: 'AlchemyCMS/alchemy_cms', branch: 'rails-4.2' And run Thanks and merry Christmas 🎄 |
Hey there - we're in the process of evaluating alchemy to integrate with a new app we've got at work. Just wondering where this PR fits in terms of priority as it'd be nice to drop a stable version into our 4.2 app. |
Our first priority is to release 3.1 (currently in rc1). Then we concentrate on Rails 4.2 for a 3.2 release. Please try the rails-4.2 branch in your app and report any Feedback. I will merge the master into that in a minute. So besides any Rails 4.2 related stuff this can be considered stable. That would be very helpful to get the 3.2 release soon. Thanks |
Conflicts: .travis.yml alchemy_cms.gemspec spec/dummy/config/application.rb spec/dummy/config/environments/test.rb
Ruby 1.9 is deprecated and support ends in mid 2015. There is **no reason** to not use Ruby 2.x
@joho I updated the branch, tests all pass \o/ It would be nice if you could test this in your Rails 4.2 app: gem 'alchemy_cms', github: 'AlchemyCMS/alchemy_cms', branch: 'rails-4.2' and report any regressions here. |
Default Rails 4.2 apps depend on sass-rails 5.0
Yes. Encountered these as well. I guess this is an sass issue after upgrading to |
We need to require it in the manifest file, since the sass file is imported via sass import statement what's not working anymore for sass-rails 5.0. Also see: jquery-ui-rails/jquery-ui-rails#89 (comment)
@afdev82 this should be fixed now. Could you please try again with current |
Thanks, this fixes the problems above. |
I found one issue: the line at |
Conflicts: Gemfile
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line is too long. [85/80]
@vmoravec fixed the rails version. Thanks for reporting 👍 |
This pull request shall only be merged after rails 4.2 was released and rails/rails#17453 gets solved. I just opened it so we can run tests on travis.
This branch will be regularly updated and finally merged into master after Rails 4.2 got released.