Commit 0efdfa1
committed
Auto merge of rust-lang#46941 - ScottAbbey:freebsd-build-update, r=alexcrichton
Re-do the FreeBSD cross-builds to use Clang and libc++. Fixes rust-lang#44433
Reviving rust-lang#45077, from @jld:
> The main goal here is to use FreeBSD's normal libc++, instead of
> statically linking the libstdc++ packaged with GCC, because that
> libstdc++ has bugs that cause rustc to deadlock inside LLVM.
>
> But the easiest way to use libc++ is to switch the build from GCC to
> Clang, and the Clang package in the Ubuntu image already knows how to
> cross-compile (given a sysroot and preferably cross-binutils), so the
> toolchain script now uses that instead of building a custom compiler.
>
> This also de-duplicates the build-toolchain.sh script.
rust-lang#45077 was close but didn't quite make it. I rebased @jld's work off the current `master` and started with that.
I was able to determine that this Travis error (rust-lang#45077 (comment)) was ultimately caused by `src/librustc_llvm/build.rs` attempting to follow a wrong value in `LLVM_STATIC_STDCPP` (rust-lang#45077 (comment)).
I looked at the downstream port for FreeBSD (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/lang/rust/) and it seems like they do not use `--enable-llvm-static-stdcpp`.
Since `libc++` is included in the FreeBSD 10+ base system, we don't need to statically link it either?
So in b989428 I have set the FreeBSD build to not actually use `LLVM_STATIC_STDCPP`.
I was able to run `./src/ci/docker/run.sh` with both `dist-i686-freebsd` and `dist-x86_64-freebsd` successfully and in about 1 minute of testing it seemed like the dist-x86_64-freebsd results worked on a FreeBSD 11 system.
It should fix rust-lang#44433, which seems to be affecting many potential users. Also FreeBSD users should be able to `./x.py build` which should help anyone who wants to upstream fixes for FreeBSD.
Questions:
Does this approach seem to be the right way to go? Do we actually really want to statically link `libc++`? (I tried that here, but it ultimately ran into a roadblock on x86_64: rust-lang#45077 (comment))
Can we rewrite the comment here to be more clear about why some systems aren't going to actually use this option:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b989428f7dec7b52d68bed6a21e9b5b0a8086267/src/bootstrap/compile.rs#L550-L553
How does this affect users of older FreeBSD systems? It seemed like no one was complaining about using a 10.3 base version in the thread for rust-lang#45077. FreeBSD seems to only officially support 10.3, 10.4, and 11.x right now, do we have to consider older users? The `libc++` stuff came in for FreeBSD 10, older FreeBSD used `libstdc++`.
Looks like @alexcrichton was leading the discussion on the previous issue:
r? @alexcrichton
Let me know what I can do to help get this through.File tree
7 files changed
+116
-234
lines changed- src
- bootstrap
- ci/docker
- dist-i686-freebsd
- dist-x86_64-freebsd
- scripts
- librustc_llvm
7 files changed
+116
-234
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
550 | 550 | | |
551 | 551 | | |
552 | 552 | | |
| 553 | + | |
553 | 554 | | |
554 | 555 | | |
555 | 556 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
2 | 2 | | |
3 | 3 | | |
4 | | - | |
| 4 | + | |
5 | 5 | | |
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
| |||
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
21 | 21 | | |
22 | 22 | | |
23 | 23 | | |
24 | 24 | | |
25 | 25 | | |
26 | 26 | | |
27 | | - | |
28 | | - | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
29 | 29 | | |
30 | 30 | | |
31 | 31 | | |
| |||
This file was deleted.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
2 | 2 | | |
3 | 3 | | |
4 | | - | |
| 4 | + | |
5 | 5 | | |
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
| |||
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
21 | 21 | | |
22 | 22 | | |
23 | 23 | | |
24 | 24 | | |
25 | 25 | | |
26 | 26 | | |
27 | | - | |
28 | | - | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
29 | 29 | | |
30 | 30 | | |
31 | 31 | | |
| |||
This file was deleted.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
| 62 | + | |
| 63 | + | |
| 64 | + | |
| 65 | + | |
| 66 | + | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
0 commit comments