You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
btrfs: send: fix duplicated rmdir operations when using extrefs
Commit 29d6d30 ("Btrfs: send, don't send rmdir for same target
multiple times") has fixed an issue that a send stream contained a rmdir
operation for the same directory multiple times. After that fix we keep
track of the last directory for which we sent a rmdir operation and
compare with it before sending a rmdir for the parent inode of a deleted
hardlink we are processing. But there is still a corner case that in
between rmdir dir operations for the same inode we find deleted hardlinks
for other parent inodes, so tracking just the last inode for which we sent
a rmdir operation is not enough.
Hardlinks of a file in the same directory are stored in the same INODE_REF
item, but if the number of hardlinks is too large and can not fit in a
leaf, we use INODE_EXTREF items to store them. The key of an INODE_EXTREF
item is (inode_id, INODE_EXTREF, hash[name, parent ino]), so between two
hardlinks for the same parent directory, we can find others for other
parent directories. For example for the reproducer below we get the
following (from a btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree output):
item 0 key (259 INODE_EXTREF 2309449) itemoff 16257 itemsize 26
index 6925 parent 257 namelen 8 name: foo.6923
item 1 key (259 INODE_EXTREF 2311350) itemoff 16231 itemsize 26
index 6588 parent 258 namelen 8 name: foo.6587
item 2 key (259 INODE_EXTREF 2457395) itemoff 16205 itemsize 26
index 6611 parent 257 namelen 8 name: foo.6609
(...)
So tracking the last directory's inode number does not work in this case
since we process a link for parent inode 257, then for 258 and then back
again for 257, and that second time we process a deleted link for 257 we
think we have not yet sent a rmdir operation.
Fix this by using a rbtree to keep track of all the directories for which
we have already sent rmdir operations, and add those directories to the
'check_dirs' ref list in process_recorded_refs() only if the directory is
not yet in the rbtree, otherwise skip it since it means we have already
sent a rmdir operation for that directory.
The following test script reproduces the problem:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
mkdir $MNT/a $MNT/b
echo 123 > $MNT/a/foo
for ((i = 1; i <= 1000; i++)); do
ln $MNT/a/foo $MNT/a/foo.$i
ln $MNT/a/foo $MNT/b/foo.$i
done
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1
btrfs send $MNT/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
rm -r $MNT/a $MNT/b
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2
btrfs send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive $MNT -f /tmp/base.send
btrfs receive $MNT -f /tmp/incremental.send
rm -f /tmp/base.send /tmp/incremental.send
umount $MNT
When running it, it fails like this:
$ ./test.sh
(...)
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: rmdir o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory
CC: <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ting-Chang Hou <[email protected]>
[ Updated changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
0 commit comments