|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +display_title: "Why We Burned It Down - John's POV (the chaos)" |
| 3 | +meta_title: "Why We Burned It Down and Rebuilt Hyprnote From Scratch" |
| 4 | +meta_description: "The messy truth about why we rewrote Hyprnote. No product philosophy, too many pivots, motion without progress—and how we finally got focused." |
| 5 | +author: "John Jeong" |
| 6 | +created: "2025-11-10" |
| 7 | +coverImage: "https://ijoptyyjrfqwaqhyxkxj.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/public_images/blog/why-we-burned-it-down/cover.png" |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +### tl;dr |
| 11 | +We didn't rewrite Hyprnote because it was smart strategy. |
| 12 | +We rewrote it because what we built before was confused. |
| 13 | +And the only way to fix it was to burn it down. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +### The Early Mess |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +When Yujong and I started, we weren't working on Hyprnote. |
| 18 | +We were trying to build an AI hardware toy that talks to kids. |
| 19 | +But hardware was slow. Brutal. Not something two people could actually ship fast.. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +So we pivoted to software. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +I'd spent a lot of time in meetings, trying AI notetakers like Clovanote. |
| 24 | +None of them captured nuance — the difference between "ok" and "OK!" matters when you're selling. |
| 25 | +I wanted something stupidly simple, clean, fast. Something I'd actually use. |
| 26 | +That was the spark for Hyprnote. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### Shiny Tech. No Philosophy. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Early on, we got distracted. |
| 31 | +We picked Tauri because it felt cool. |
| 32 | +We said "let's do local-first everything" because it sounded clever. |
| 33 | +Transcription, LLM, cloud, BYOK, lifetime license… everything. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +We had no product philosophy. |
| 36 | +No sharp segment. |
| 37 | +Just vibes. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +People liked it at first. Open source folks said they'd use it over Granola just because it was open source. That gave us confidence… but also made us more confused. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +Local-first ≠ open source. |
| 42 | +They're adjacent. Not the same. |
| 43 | +And we never picked a lane. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +### YC Made It Worse |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +Then Y Combinator happened. |
| 48 | +And this is where we stopped thinking straight. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +Our group partners kept asking the right questions. Every single time. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +The question that we struggled the most was: |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +> Who are your users? |
| 55 | +
|
| 56 | +We said that we were focusing on enterprise — but we weren't sure. |
| 57 | +We were still trying to figure out who we should be selling to: banks, defense, military, or whatever. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +They weren't the problem. We were. |
| 60 | +Instead of slowing down to reflect, we tried to answer immediately. |
| 61 | +We mistook speed for clarity. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +As James from Pioneer Fund told me: |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +> Don't mistake motion for progress. |
| 66 | +
|
| 67 | +He said it's written on his son's door. |
| 68 | +We fell into that trap hard. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +We were moving fast. |
| 71 | +Just in 12 different directions at once. |
| 72 | +Vectors everywhere. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +### Too Much Logic. Too Much Talking. Too Little Clarity. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +We debated everything. Local vs cloud. Enterprise vs prosumer. Bottom-up vs top-down. |
| 77 | +We tried to _logic_ our way into clarity. |
| 78 | +You can't. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +Add hiring on top of that and it got worse. |
| 81 | +Too many opinions. Too much communication overhead. |
| 82 | +Alignment took forever. We moved slower, not faster. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +Honestly, YC was a wake-up call for me on hiring. |
| 85 | +I'm not hiring again for a while. Just me and Yujong now — and we're moving faster than ever. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +### Investors Pushed One Way. My Gut Said Another. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +Early angels pushed the "local-first enterprise" angle. |
| 90 | +"Regulated industries love data sovereignty." |
| 91 | +And yeah, they do. But enterprise ≠ local-first. |
| 92 | +They care about compliance, SOC2, consent, legal — we weren't ready for any of that. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +And the whole time, my gut said: |
| 95 | +Build for people like you. |
| 96 | +Busy individuals who live in meetings and want a tool that just _works_. |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +I ignored my gut for months. That was on me. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +### The Product Rotted |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +Because we never picked a path, we tried to build everything: |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +- Local speech-to-text |
| 105 | +- Local LLM |
| 106 | +- Bring-your-own-endpoints |
| 107 | +- owhisper |
| 108 | +- Admin server |
| 109 | +- Hybrid setups no one fully understood |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +It became this big, over-engineered pile of "potential" that felt bad to use. |
| 112 | +The codebase was tangled. The design was directionless. |
| 113 | +I didn't even like opening our own app anymore. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +### Motion Isn't Progress |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +For months, I was obsessed with motion. |
| 118 | +Metrics. Launches. Growth hacks. |
| 119 | +But everything starts and ends with product. |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +I've seen the hype cycles in the valley. They all crash. |
| 122 | +What's left after the hype is gone is the product. Nothing else. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +### The MVP Isn't What It Used to Be |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +Around this time, I read something from the Linear blog that really clicked. |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +The definition of "MVP" is different now. |
| 129 | +Back in the lean startup era, an MVP could be a scrappy little wedge — barely working. |
| 130 | +Not anymore. |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +Users expect more. |
| 133 | +Products have matured. |
| 134 | +An MVP today still has to _feel complete_. |
| 135 | +It can be scrappy under the hood, but it can't be crappy in the hands. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +And if your wedge is _design_, like us, you don't even get that scrappy margin. |
| 138 | +You have to nail it. |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +So we stopped trying to play the "ship crap fast" game. |
| 141 | +We're going to build something tight, sharp, and clean — and ship it with confidence. |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +### Ferrari vs Porsche |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +I've been thinking a lot about differentiators. Honestly? I don't have a perfect answer. |
| 146 | +Granola exists. They're great. They're Porsche. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +We want to be Ferrari. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +Both are sports cars. Both fast. Both in the same league. |
| 151 | +But Ferrari is hand-crafted, opinionated, focused on a specific segment. |
| 152 | +Porsche is more accessible, more mass. |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +We're not trying to win everyone. |
| 155 | +We're trying to dominate a niche that _really cares_. |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +We'll filter people through a waitlist. We'll charge from the start. |
| 158 | +And if people don't like that, that's fine. We're not for everyone. |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +### Just Focus |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | +I've stopped caring about what others are building. |
| 163 | +Competitors matter long term, sure. |
| 164 | +But right now, it's us, our users, and the product. |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +### Burn It Down. Build It Better. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +Fixing the old app would've taken longer than rewriting it. |
| 169 | +And honestly — it didn't deserve to be fixed. |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +So we burned it down. |
| 172 | +We rebuilt everything from scratch. |
| 173 | +New app. Clean architecture. Sharper focus. |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +This time: |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +- We're building for people like us. |
| 178 | +- We're opinionated. |
| 179 | +- We're not mistaking speed for progress. |
| 180 | +- We're not shipping crap just to "look busy." |
| 181 | +- We're going Ferrari mode. |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +This isn't a polished comeback story. |
| 184 | +It's just us finally admitting what we messed up. |
| 185 | +And getting back to building a product we actually believe in. |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +<div className="not-prose my-8"> |
| 190 | + <p className="font-serif italic text-lg font-semibold mb-3 text-stone-700">Hyprnote</p> |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + <div className="flex gap-6"> |
| 193 | + <div className="flex gap-2 items-center"> |
| 194 | + <div className="w-8 h-8 rounded-full overflow-hidden shrink-0"> |
| 195 | + <img |
| 196 | + src="https://ijoptyyjrfqwaqhyxkxj.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/public_images/team/john.png" |
| 197 | + alt="John Jeong" |
| 198 | + width={32} |
| 199 | + height={32} |
| 200 | + className="w-full h-full object-cover border-none! my-0!" |
| 201 | + /> |
| 202 | + </div> |
| 203 | + <span className="text-sm text-stone-600">John Jeong</span> |
| 204 | + </div> |
| 205 | + <div className="flex gap-2 items-center"> |
| 206 | + <div className="w-8 h-8 rounded-full overflow-hidden shrink-0"> |
| 207 | + <img |
| 208 | + src="https://ijoptyyjrfqwaqhyxkxj.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/public_images/team/yujong.png" |
| 209 | + alt="Yujong Lee" |
| 210 | + width={32} |
| 211 | + height={32} |
| 212 | + className="w-full h-full object-cover border-none! my-0!" |
| 213 | + /> |
| 214 | + </div> |
| 215 | + <span className="text-sm text-stone-600">Yujong Lee</span> |
| 216 | + </div> |
| 217 | + </div> |
| 218 | +</div> |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +<img |
| 221 | +src="https://ijoptyyjrfqwaqhyxkxj.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/public_images/hyprnote/signature-dark.svg" |
| 222 | +alt="Hyprnote Signature" |
| 223 | +width={124} |
| 224 | +height={60} |
| 225 | +className="opacity-80 object-contain border-none!" |
| 226 | +/> |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +<CtaCard/> |
0 commit comments