Unfork invariant and instead use it from reactProdInvariant #12585
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Apr 17, 2018
This was referenced Apr 19, 2018
rhagigi
pushed a commit
to rhagigi/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to #12539. After chatting with @sophiebits we decided it would be clearer if we just used
invariantin both places.Pros:
%s, on www we'll no longer attempt to replace it (that was a potential bug in Preserve error codes for invariants on www #12539).Cons:
invariantimplementation,framesToPropmight need to account for React errors specifically (and be2). Or maybe it doesn't matter since we get the exact message through the decoder anyway.