Skip to content

Commit f4d8497

Browse files
mpidashmpidash
committed
Run msbuild pack
1 parent 38b41a3 commit f4d8497

13 files changed

+26
-26
lines changed

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.cs.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Obecné přetypování (IL unbox.any) používané sekvencí vrácenou metodou E
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">AsSpan je efektivnější než Substring. Substring provádí kopírování řetězce O(n), zatímco AsSpan ho neprovádí a má konstantní náklady.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">AsSpan je efektivnější než Substring. Substring provádí kopírování řetězce O(n), zatímco AsSpan ho neprovádí a má konstantní náklady.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.de.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Erweiterungen und benutzerdefinierte Konvertierungen werden bei generischen Type
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">"AsSpan" ist effizienter als "Substring". Im Gegensatz zu "Substring" führt "AsSpan" keine O(n)-Zeichenfolgenkopie durch und bietet daher konstante Kosten.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">"AsSpan" ist effizienter als "Substring". Im Gegensatz zu "Substring" führt "AsSpan" keine O(n)-Zeichenfolgenkopie durch und bietet daher konstante Kosten.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.es.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ La ampliación y las conversiones definidas por el usuario no se admiten con tip
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">'AsSpan' es más eficaz que 'Substring'. 'Substring' realiza una copia de cadena O(n), mientras que 'AsSpan' no lo hace y tiene un costo constante.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">'AsSpan' es más eficaz que 'Substring'. 'Substring' realiza una copia de cadena O(n), mientras que 'AsSpan' no lo hace y tiene un costo constante.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.fr.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Les conversions étendues et définies par l’utilisateur ne sont pas prises en
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">« AsSpan » est plus efficace, « SUBSTRING ». 'Substring’ effectue une copie de chaîne O (n), alors que ’AsSpan’ ne possède pas un coût constant.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">« AsSpan » est plus efficace, « SUBSTRING ». 'Substring’ effectue une copie de chaîne O (n), alors que ’AsSpan’ ne possède pas un coût constant.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.it.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ L'ampliamento e le conversioni definite dall'utente non sono supportate con tipi
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">'AsSpan' è più efficace di 'Substring'. 'Substring' esegue una copia della stringa O(n), mentre 'AsSpan' non la esegue e ha un costo costante.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">'AsSpan' è più efficace di 'Substring'. 'Substring' esegue una copia della stringa O(n), mentre 'AsSpan' non la esegue e ha un costo costante.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ja.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType&lt;T&gt; で使用されるジェネリック型チェック (
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">'AsSpan' の方が 'Substring' より効率的です。'Substring' は O(n) 文字列コピーを実行しますが、'AsSpan' はこれを実行せず、固定コストがあります。</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">'AsSpan' の方が 'Substring' より効率的です。'Substring' は O(n) 文字列コピーを実行しますが、'AsSpan' はこれを実行せず、固定コストがあります。</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ko.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Enumerable.OfType&lt;T&gt;에서 사용하는 제네릭 형식 검사(C# 'is'
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">'AsSpan'은 'Substring'보다 효율적입니다. 'Substring'은 O(n) 문자열 복사를 수행하는 반면 'AsSpan'은 수행하지 않으며 일정한 비용이 듭니다.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">'AsSpan'은 'Substring'보다 효율적입니다. 'Substring'은 O(n) 문자열 복사를 수행하는 반면 'AsSpan'은 수행하지 않으며 일정한 비용이 듭니다.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pl.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Konwersje poszerzane i zdefiniowane przez użytkownika nie są obsługiwane w pr
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">Ciąg „AsSpan” jest bardziej wydajny niż ciąg „Substring”. Ciąg „Substring” wykonuje kopię ciągu O(n), natomiast ciąg „AsSpan” nie wykonuje i ponadto ma stały koszt.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">Ciąg „AsSpan” jest bardziej wydajny niż ciąg „Substring”. Ciąg „Substring” wykonuje kopię ciągu O(n), natomiast ciąg „AsSpan” nie wykonuje i ponadto ma stały koszt.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.pt-BR.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Ampliação e conversões definidas pelo usuário não são compatíveis com tip
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">'AsSpan' é mais eficiente do que 'Substring'. 'Substring' executa uma cópia de cadeia de caracteres O(n), enquanto 'AsSpan' não tem e tem um custo constante.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">'AsSpan' é mais eficiente do que 'Substring'. 'Substring' executa uma cópia de cadeia de caracteres O(n), enquanto 'AsSpan' não tem e tem um custo constante.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

‎src/NetAnalyzers/Core/Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers/xlf/MicrosoftNetCoreAnalyzersResources.ru.xlf‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1919,8 +1919,8 @@ Widening and user defined conversions are not supported with generic types.</sou
19191919
<note />
19201920
</trans-unit>
19211921
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringDescription">
1922-
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient then 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923-
<target state="translated">"AsSpan" более эффективен, чем "Substring". "Substring" выполняет копирование строки O(n), тогда как "AsSpan" не имеет постоянных затрат.</target>
1922+
<source>'AsSpan' is more efficient than 'Substring'. 'Substring' performs an O(n) string copy, while 'AsSpan' does not and has a constant cost.</source>
1923+
<target state="needs-review-translation">"AsSpan" более эффективен, чем "Substring". "Substring" выполняет копирование строки O(n), тогда как "AsSpan" не имеет постоянных затрат.</target>
19241924
<note />
19251925
</trans-unit>
19261926
<trans-unit id="PreferAsSpanOverSubstringMessage">

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)