Skip to content

Conversation

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member

xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x is only defined when OF is enabled. This would cause a compile error:

drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:532:33: error: ‘xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘xhci_plat_runtime_resume’?
{ "PHYT0039", (kernel_ulong_t)&xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x },
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
xhci_plat_runtime_resume
CC [M] drivers/usb/dwc3/core.o

It should be moved.

xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x is only defined when OF is enabled.
This would cause a compile error:

drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c:532:33: error: ‘xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘xhci_plat_runtime_resume’?
  { "PHYT0039", (kernel_ulong_t)&xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x },
                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                 xhci_plat_runtime_resume
  CC [M]  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.o

It should be moved.

Reported-by: jianghaoa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: guanwentao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: WangYuli <[email protected]>
@opsiff
Copy link
Member

opsiff commented May 16, 2024

/ok-to-test

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member Author

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 代码重构导致xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x结构体被移动到了#ifdef CONFIG_OF的上下文之外,这可能会导致在非CONFIG_OF环境中该结构体不再被定义。

合并相似的问题是否建议立即修改:

Syntax and logical errors:

  • 无明显的语法或逻辑错误。

Code refactoring and quality:

  • 考虑将xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x结构体的定义移回#ifdef CONFIG_OF块内,以确保在非CONFIG_OF环境中它被正确忽略。

Performance optimization:

  • 当前提交的更改不会对性能产生直接影响。

Security vulnerabilities:

  • 当前提交的更改不会直接影响安全性。

Best practices:

  • 确保所有更改都有相应的注释说明,解释为什么需要进行这样的重构。
  • 检查是否有其他代码依赖于xhci_plat_phytium_pe220x结构体的位置,以确保移动后的位置不会破坏现有功能。

幽默,这个大模型好像不太聪明

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • 代码重构导致的重复代码:在xhci_plat_phytium_pe220xxhci_plat_marvell_armada结构体中,.quirks成员都设置为XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME,这是重复代码的一个例子。

是否建议立即修改:

建议的修改:

  • 提取公共代码到一个单独的函数或宏中,以减少重复并提高代码的可维护性。例如,可以创建一个函数init_xhci_plat_priv,接受struct xhci_plat_priv作为参数,并根据需要设置quirks成员。然后在所有需要设置quirks的地方调用这个函数。
  • 如果xhci_plat_phytium_pe220xxhci_plat_marvell_armada是不同的硬件实例,那么应该提供一个初始化它们的函数,并在需要时调用该函数。这样可以避免重复设置相同的quirks值。

@Avenger-285714
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

@Avenger-285714 Avenger-285714 merged commit 6859ff1 into deepin-community:linux-6.6.y May 16, 2024
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Avenger-285714
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zeno-sole for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Avenger-285714
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zeno-sole for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Avenger-285714 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
[ Upstream commit 12ae97c ]

The device stores IPv6 addresses that are used for encapsulation in
linear memory that is managed by the driver.

Changing the remote address of an ip6gre net device never worked
properly, but since cited commit the following reproducer [1] would
result in a warning [2] and a memory leak [3]. The problem is that the
new remote address is never added by the driver to its hash table (and
therefore the device) and the old address is never removed from it.

Fix by programming the new address when the configuration of the ip6gre
net device changes and removing the old one. If the address did not
change, then the above would result in increasing the reference count of
the address and then decreasing it.

[1]
 # ip link add name bla up type ip6gre local 2001:db8:1::1 remote 2001:db8:2::1 tos inherit ttl inherit
 # ip link set dev bla type ip6gre remote 2001:db8:3::1
 # ip link del dev bla
 # devlink dev reload pci/0000:01:00.0

[2]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1682 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c:3002 mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x140/0x1d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1682 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-custom-g86b5b55bc835 #151
Hardware name: Nvidia SN5600/VMOD0013, BIOS 5.13 05/31/2023
RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_put+0x140/0x1d0
[...]
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 mlxsw_sp_router_netdevice_event+0x55f/0x1240
 notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0
 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x39/0x90
 unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x63e/0x9d0
 rtnl_dellink+0x16b/0x3a0
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x142/0x3f0
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100
 netlink_unicast+0x242/0x390
 netlink_sendmsg+0x1de/0x420
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bd/0x320
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0
 __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0
 do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1a0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

[3]
unreferenced object 0xffff898081f597a0 (size 32):
  comm "ip", pid 1626, jiffies 4294719324
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    20 01 0d b8 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01   ...............
    21 49 61 83 80 89 ff ff 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00  !Ia.............
  backtrace (crc fd9be911):
    [<00000000df89c55d>] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1da/0x260
    [<00000000ff2a1ddb>] mlxsw_sp_ipv6_addr_kvdl_index_get+0x281/0x340
    [<000000009ddd445d>] mlxsw_sp_router_netdevice_event+0x47b/0x1240
    [<00000000743e7757>] notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0
    [<000000007c7b9e13>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x39/0x90
    [<000000002509645d>] register_netdevice+0x5f7/0x7a0
    [<00000000c2e7d2a9>] ip6gre_newlink_common.isra.0+0x65/0x130
    [<0000000087cd6d8d>] ip6gre_newlink+0x72/0x120
    [<000000004df7c7cc>] rtnl_newlink+0x471/0xa20
    [<0000000057ed632a>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x142/0x3f0
    [<0000000032e0d5b5>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100
    [<00000000908bca63>] netlink_unicast+0x242/0x390
    [<00000000cdbe1c87>] netlink_sendmsg+0x1de/0x420
    [<0000000011db153e>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x2bd/0x320
    [<000000003b6d53eb>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0
    [<00000000cae27c62>] __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0

Fixes: cf42911 ("mlxsw: spectrum_ipip: Use common hash table for IPv6 address mapping")
Reported-by: Maksym Yaremchuk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/e91012edc5a6cb9df37b78fd377f669381facfcb.1729866134.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
…ce_finalize()

commit 41cddf8 upstream.

If migration succeeded, we called
folio_migrate_flags()->mem_cgroup_migrate() to migrate the memcg from the
old to the new folio.  This will set memcg_data of the old folio to 0.

Similarly, if migration failed, memcg_data of the dst folio is left unset.

If we call folio_putback_lru() on such folios (memcg_data == 0), we will
add the folio to be freed to the LRU, making memcg code unhappy.  Running
the hmm selftests:

  # ./hmm-tests
  ...
  #  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.migrate ...
  [  102.078007][T14893] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x7ff27d200 pfn:0x13cc00
  [  102.079974][T14893] anon flags: 0x17ff00000020018(uptodate|dirty|swapbacked|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
  [  102.082037][T14893] raw: 017ff00000020018 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8881353896c9
  [  102.083687][T14893] raw: 00000007ff27d200 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  [  102.085331][T14893] page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg && !mem_cgroup_disabled())
  [  102.087230][T14893] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [  102.088279][T14893] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14893 at ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:726 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.090478][T14893] Modules linked in:
  [  102.091244][T14893] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14893 Comm: hmm-tests Not tainted 6.13.0-09623-g6c216bc522fd deepin-community#151
  [  102.093089][T14893] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  [  102.094848][T14893] RIP: 0010:folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.096104][T14893] Code: ...
  [  102.099908][T14893] RSP: 0018:ffffc900236c37b0 EFLAGS: 00010293
  [  102.101152][T14893] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea0004f30000 RCX: ffffffff8183f426
  [  102.102684][T14893] RDX: ffff8881063cb880 RSI: ffffffff81b8117f RDI: ffff8881063cb880
  [  102.104227][T14893] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
  [  102.105757][T14893] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffffc900236c37d8
  [  102.107296][T14893] R13: ffff888277a2bcb0 R14: 000000000000001f R15: 0000000000000000
  [  102.108830][T14893] FS:  00007ff27dbdd740(0000) GS:ffff888277a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [  102.110643][T14893] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [  102.111924][T14893] CR2: 00007ff27d400000 CR3: 000000010866e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
  [  102.113478][T14893] PKRU: 55555554
  [  102.114172][T14893] Call Trace:
  [  102.114805][T14893]  <TASK>
  [  102.115397][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.116547][T14893]  ? __warn.cold+0x110/0x210
  [  102.117461][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.118667][T14893]  ? report_bug+0x1b9/0x320
  [  102.119571][T14893]  ? handle_bug+0x54/0x90
  [  102.120494][T14893]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x50
  [  102.121433][T14893]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  [  102.122435][T14893]  ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x76/0xd0
  [  102.123506][T14893]  ? dump_page+0x4f/0x60
  [  102.124352][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.125500][T14893]  folio_batch_move_lru+0xd4/0x200
  [  102.126577][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.127505][T14893]  __folio_batch_add_and_move+0x391/0x720
  [  102.128633][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.129550][T14893]  folio_putback_lru+0x16/0x80
  [  102.130564][T14893]  migrate_device_finalize+0x9b/0x530
  [  102.131640][T14893]  dmirror_migrate_to_device.constprop.0+0x7c5/0xad0
  [  102.133047][T14893]  dmirror_fops_unlocked_ioctl+0x89b/0xc80

Likely, nothing else goes wrong: putting the last folio reference will
remove the folio from the LRU again.  So besides memcg complaining, adding
the folio to be freed to the LRU is just an unnecessary step.

The new flow resembles what we have in migrate_folio_move(): add the dst
to the lru, remove migration ptes, unlock and unref dst.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 8763cb4 ("mm/migrate: new memory migration helper for use with device memory")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <[email protected]>
Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 78f579cb7d825134e071a1714d8d0c4fd0ffe459)
opsiff pushed a commit to opsiff/UOS-kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
…ce_finalize()

commit 41cddf8 upstream.

If migration succeeded, we called
folio_migrate_flags()->mem_cgroup_migrate() to migrate the memcg from the
old to the new folio.  This will set memcg_data of the old folio to 0.

Similarly, if migration failed, memcg_data of the dst folio is left unset.

If we call folio_putback_lru() on such folios (memcg_data == 0), we will
add the folio to be freed to the LRU, making memcg code unhappy.  Running
the hmm selftests:

  # ./hmm-tests
  ...
  #  RUN           hmm.hmm_device_private.migrate ...
  [  102.078007][T14893] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x7ff27d200 pfn:0x13cc00
  [  102.079974][T14893] anon flags: 0x17ff00000020018(uptodate|dirty|swapbacked|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
  [  102.082037][T14893] raw: 017ff00000020018 dead000000000100 dead000000000122 ffff8881353896c9
  [  102.083687][T14893] raw: 00000007ff27d200 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  [  102.085331][T14893] page dumped because: VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!memcg && !mem_cgroup_disabled())
  [  102.087230][T14893] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [  102.088279][T14893] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 14893 at ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:726 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.090478][T14893] Modules linked in:
  [  102.091244][T14893] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14893 Comm: hmm-tests Not tainted 6.13.0-09623-g6c216bc522fd deepin-community#151
  [  102.093089][T14893] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  [  102.094848][T14893] RIP: 0010:folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.096104][T14893] Code: ...
  [  102.099908][T14893] RSP: 0018:ffffc900236c37b0 EFLAGS: 00010293
  [  102.101152][T14893] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffea0004f30000 RCX: ffffffff8183f426
  [  102.102684][T14893] RDX: ffff8881063cb880 RSI: ffffffff81b8117f RDI: ffff8881063cb880
  [  102.104227][T14893] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000
  [  102.105757][T14893] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffffc900236c37d8
  [  102.107296][T14893] R13: ffff888277a2bcb0 R14: 000000000000001f R15: 0000000000000000
  [  102.108830][T14893] FS:  00007ff27dbdd740(0000) GS:ffff888277a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [  102.110643][T14893] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [  102.111924][T14893] CR2: 00007ff27d400000 CR3: 000000010866e000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
  [  102.113478][T14893] PKRU: 55555554
  [  102.114172][T14893] Call Trace:
  [  102.114805][T14893]  <TASK>
  [  102.115397][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.116547][T14893]  ? __warn.cold+0x110/0x210
  [  102.117461][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.118667][T14893]  ? report_bug+0x1b9/0x320
  [  102.119571][T14893]  ? handle_bug+0x54/0x90
  [  102.120494][T14893]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x50
  [  102.121433][T14893]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  [  102.122435][T14893]  ? __wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x76/0xd0
  [  102.123506][T14893]  ? dump_page+0x4f/0x60
  [  102.124352][T14893]  ? folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x10e/0x170
  [  102.125500][T14893]  folio_batch_move_lru+0xd4/0x200
  [  102.126577][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.127505][T14893]  __folio_batch_add_and_move+0x391/0x720
  [  102.128633][T14893]  ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10
  [  102.129550][T14893]  folio_putback_lru+0x16/0x80
  [  102.130564][T14893]  migrate_device_finalize+0x9b/0x530
  [  102.131640][T14893]  dmirror_migrate_to_device.constprop.0+0x7c5/0xad0
  [  102.133047][T14893]  dmirror_fops_unlocked_ioctl+0x89b/0xc80

Likely, nothing else goes wrong: putting the last folio reference will
remove the folio from the LRU again.  So besides memcg complaining, adding
the folio to be freed to the LRU is just an unnecessary step.

The new flow resembles what we have in migrate_folio_move(): add the dst
to the lru, remove migration ptes, unlock and unref dst.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 8763cb4 ("mm/migrate: new memory migration helper for use with device memory")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <[email protected]>
Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Cc: Alistair Popple <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 78f579cb7d825134e071a1714d8d0c4fd0ffe459)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants