You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Possibly I was using astronomia wrongly. Suncalc3 was fast and easy. but glad I've found the one that reproduces the gold standard, JPL Horizons. Is it the gold standard?
Cosinekitty Astronomy Library Test
Test Time: 2025-08-10T17:26:14.030Z
Observer: -32.7761216°, 149.8396389°
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Possibly I was using astronomia wrongly. Suncalc3 was fast and easy. but glad I've found the one that reproduces the gold standard, JPL Horizons. Is it the gold standard?
Cosinekitty Astronomy Library Test
Test Time: 2025-08-10T17:26:14.030Z
Observer: -32.7761216°, 149.8396389°
Cosinekitty Library Results:
Moon RA: 22.499087 hours
Moon Dec: -10.057977°
Accuracy Validation:
JPL Horizons (reference): Az=298.85°, El=51.81°
Cosinekitty astronomy-engine: Az=298.86°, El=51.83°
Errors: Az=0.01°, El=0.02°
Library Comparison Summary:
Cosinekitty: Az=298.86°, El=51.83° (errors: 0.01°, 0.02°) ← BEST
SunCalc3: Az=297.73°, El=52.06° (errors: 1.12°, 0.25°)
Astronomia: Az=306.90°, El=44.52° (errors: 8.05°, 7.29°) ← WORST
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions