You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The optimization replaces blocking `time.sleep()` with non-blocking `await asyncio.sleep()`, which fundamentally changes how the async retry mechanism behaves in concurrent scenarios.
**Key Change:**
- **Blocking sleep → Non-blocking sleep**: `time.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)` becomes `await asyncio.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)`
- Added `import asyncio` to support the async sleep functionality
**Why This Improves Performance:**
1. **Event Loop Efficiency**: `time.sleep()` blocks the entire event loop thread, preventing other coroutines from executing during backoff periods. `asyncio.sleep()` yields control back to the event loop, allowing concurrent operations to proceed.
2. **Concurrency Benefits**: In concurrent scenarios (like the test cases with 50-200 simultaneous retries), the original version creates thread contention as all operations compete for the blocked event loop. The optimized version allows proper interleaving of operations.
3. **Throughput vs Runtime Trade-off**: While individual function runtime appears slower (19.4ms vs 15.4ms), this is because the profiler measures wall-clock time including async context switching overhead. However, **throughput improves by 20.9%** (202,315 → 244,660 ops/sec) because multiple operations can execute concurrently instead of being serialized by blocking sleeps.
**Optimal for**: High-concurrency scenarios with many simultaneous retry operations, where the async-compliant sleep allows the event loop to efficiently manage multiple failing operations that need backoff delays.
0 commit comments