Skip to content

Conversation

@andreasabel
Copy link
Member

[ fixed #1484 ] prove m<n⇒m≤1+n by composition ≤-step ∘ <⇒≤

The pattern matching proof is a bit awkward (as the property is, which
combines two steps of information loss).

The pattern matching proof is a bit awkward (as the property is, which
combines two steps of information loss).
@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt added this to the v1.7 milestone Apr 24, 2021
@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt merged commit 9076c9b into master Apr 24, 2021
@MatthewDaggitt MatthewDaggitt deleted the issue-1484-lt-imp-le-suc branch April 24, 2021 04:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

A dubious property of < that should be factored into two useful properties

3 participants