You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am studying a layout engine for implementing a Flexbox.
If we run this code, we can see the stack overflow.
Of course, it is a little bit silly, anyway I'm curious why there is no checking for recursive element.
I think it may be the intention for deligating it to the user-land or reducing a computing overhead. There is no conviction.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am studying a layout engine for implementing a Flexbox.
If we run this code, we can see the stack overflow.
Of course, it is a little bit silly, anyway I'm curious why there is no checking for recursive element.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions